Re: Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-23 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle? > >      * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a >        single change in the Spin. There actually was a change, SLIM was >        replaced with LXDM, but L

Re: Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-22 Thread Seth Vidal
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Christoph Wickert wrote: >> then you can diff the two more easily. > > I know how to use rpm, but as long as I don't have all the nightlies > there is not much to compare. All I can compare is the F12 spin with the > latest nightly and this wont tell me much about what happe

Re: Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-22 Thread Christoph Wickert
Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 21:24 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:09:27 +0100, Christoph wrote: > > > > > > rpm -qa --qf "%{name}\n" | sort > rpm-out > > > > > > > > > > then you can diff the two more easily. > > > > > > > > I know how to use rpm, but as long as I don't hav

Re: Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-22 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:09:27 +0100, Christoph wrote: > > > > rpm -qa --qf "%{name}\n" | sort > rpm-out > > > > > > > > then you can diff the two more easily. > > > > > > I know how to use rpm, but as long as I don't have all the nightlies > > > there is not much to compare. All I can compare is th

Re: Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-22 Thread Christoph Wickert
Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 14:49 -0500 schrieb Mike McGrath: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 09:13 -0400 schrieb Seth Vidal: > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wro

Re: Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-22 Thread Mike McGrath
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 09:13 -0400 schrieb Seth Vidal: > > > > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote > > > > >> Any ideas what made Fedora become so fat or how to further in

Re: Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-22 Thread Christoph Wickert
Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 09:13 -0400 schrieb Seth Vidal: > > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote > > >> Any ideas what made Fedora become so fat or how to further investigate > >> this? > > > > I've found with Moblin and Sug

Re: Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-22 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Christoph Wickert >> wrote: >>> >>> Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle? >>> >>>      * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1

Re: Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-22 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 01:50 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle? > > * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a > single change in the Spin. There actually was a change, SLIM was > replaced with LXDM,

Re: Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-22 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Christoph Wickert > wrote: >> Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle? >> >>      * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a >>        single change in the Spin. There actua

Re: Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-22 Thread Adam Miller
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle? > >      * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a >        single change in the Spin. There actually was a change, SLIM was >        replaced with LXDM, but L

Re: Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-22 Thread Seth Vidal
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle?      * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a        single change in the Spin. There actually was a change,

Re: Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-22 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle? > >      * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a >        single change in the Spin. There actually was a change, SLIM was >        replaced with LXDM, but

Re: Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-22 Thread Christoph Wickert
Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 09:43 +0100 schrieb Hans de Goede: > Hi, > > Maybe somehow fluid-soundfont-gm or fluid-soundfont-lite-patches is getting > dragged in ? Nope, according to the logs [1+2] they are not in there. Also it's a steady growth instead of some big changes. Regards, Christoph

Re: Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-22 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, Maybe somehow fluid-soundfont-gm or fluid-soundfont-lite-patches is getting dragged in ? Those are quite big. Regards, Hans On 03/22/2010 01:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle? > >* The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509

Fedora has become fat!

2010-03-21 Thread Christoph Wickert
Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle? * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a single change in the Spin. There actually was a change, SLIM was replaced with LXDM, but LXDM is actually smaller because it doesn't require the de