Thanks for being so patient and explaining so much stuff to me!
Bowen
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:10:33PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 00:56 -0500, Bowen Wang wrote:
> > These are all the files in /etc/yum.repos.d/
> >
> > fedora-cisco-openh264.repo
> > fedora-rawhide.repo
On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 00:56 -0500, Bowen Wang wrote:
> These are all the files in /etc/yum.repos.d/
>
> fedora-cisco-openh264.repo
> fedora-rawhide.repo
> fedora.repo
> fedora-updates.repo
> fedora-updates-testing.repo
>
> Is this correct?
Yes, that's fine. If you look in fedora-rawhide.repo you
These are all the files in /etc/yum.repos.d/
fedora-cisco-openh264.repo
fedora-rawhide.repo
fedora.repo
fedora-updates.repo
fedora-updates-testing.repo
Is this correct?
Bowen
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:36:53PM -0700, stan wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 21:43:21 -0500
> Bowen Wang wrote:
>
> > Hi
On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 09:52 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Bowen Wang
> wrote:
> > This is the content of the file /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo on my
> > laptop:
> > [fedora]
> > name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch
> > failovermethod=priority
> > #baseurl=http:/
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 21:43:21 -0500
Bowen Wang wrote:
> Hi Stan,
> I am not sure if I know what you are saying, can you explain it again?
> Thanks.
I wasn't really paying attention to the conversation, but it sounded
like you wanted to have rawhide on your machine. But rawhide uses its
own repo,
Hi Stan,
I am not sure if I know what you are saying, can you explain it again?
Thanks.
Bowen
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:12 PM, stan wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 09:52:30 +0800
> Christopher Meng wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Bowen Wang
> > wrote:
> > > This is the content of t
Hi Chris,
I have clicked the address
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=fedora-rawhide&arch=x86_64
I got the following stuff:
# repo = rawhide arch = x86_64 country = US country = CA
http://mirror.n5tech.com/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/os/http://mirrors.mit.e
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 09:52:30 +0800
Christopher Meng wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Bowen Wang
> wrote:
> > This is the content of the file /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo on my
> > laptop:
> > [fedora]
> > name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch
> > failovermethod=priority
> > #baseurl=http:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Bowen Wang wrote:
> This is the content of the file /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo on my
> laptop:
> [fedora]
> name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch
> failovermethod=priority
> #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/$releasever/Everything
On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 12:31 -0500, Bowen Wang wrote:
> I think maybe it is just a coincidence, after I run the
> dnf upgrade --refrsh
> at the first time, the mirror I am using just got the latest update. So
> I can upgrade my system when running the second time.
To be clear, the mirror system is
This is the content of the file /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo on my
laptop:
[fedora]
name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch
failovermethod=priority
#baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/$releasever/Everything/$basearch/os/
metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metali
On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 10:43 -0500, Bowen Wang wrote:
> I just got up and run
> dnf upgrade --refresh
> It still didn't work, then I tried
> dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=rawhide
> The terminal output is error: no kernel packages were found.
> After that I run
> dnf upgrade --refresh aga
I just got up and run
dnf upgrade --refresh
It still didn't work, then I tried
dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=rawhide
The terminal output is error: no kernel packages were found.
After that I run
dnf upgrade --refresh again. My system start to upgrade.
I found it pretty weird because I t
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 07:06:30PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> OK, I wrote a really long explanation which is below, but I'll put a
> summary up here: there's some clever stuff that goes on involving the
> Fedora mirror system and the repository metadata, a consequence of
> which is that with a
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 23:22 -0500, Bowen Wang wrote:
> Okay, that makes sense.
> I just run the command:
> dnf upgrade --refresh
> to update my rawhide system. It only downloaded one package, the package
> name is Fedora Rawhide, after that, there isn't any installation
> process, then the command
Okay, that makes sense.
I just run the command:
dnf upgrade --refresh
to update my rawhide system. It only downloaded one package, the package
name is Fedora Rawhide, after that, there isn't any installation
process, then the command just output complete, and quit. I think there
must be one install
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 19:39 -0500, Bowen Wang wrote:
> I saw the 20160927 images in the wesite, but I when I ran the dnf
> upgrade --refresh, it says nothing to do, is that normal? Thanks.
It's not unusual...there's some other stuff that happens between the
compose 'completing' and you actually se
I saw the 20160927 images in the wesite, but I when I ran the dnf
upgrade --refresh, it says nothing to do, is that normal? Thanks.
Bowen
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 05:14:31PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 00:06 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> > Missing expected images:
On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 00:06 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
>
> Failed openQA tests: 4/102 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
>
> New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20160926.n.0):
>
> ID: 36663 Test
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 4/102 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20160926.n.0):
ID: 36663 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/366
20 matches
Mail list logo
