Hi Miro,
thanks for good mail.
I will try to explain some things regarding Developer Assistant.
Primary we want to implement just GitHub but we decided to implement
OpenShift during the developing phase as well.
Current focus is mainly GitHub and OpenShift (in future).
More things have to be ha
On 06/03/2013 12:52 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> - gitlab has(had?) no such concept of public repositories so the idea
> of someone forking and contributing a patch was not even in the system
Just a quick note on that. In v5.2 (released this month) there was
introduced a new feature wherelogged-in use
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 18:21:28 -0400
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Personally, I value that advantage and have advocated for free
> infrastructure and emphasized that while setting up Ask Fedora etc
> but the question really is, is that enough of an advantage on its own
> to continue investing in maintai
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 16:45 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 31 May 2013 15:19, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > few days ago I was explaining to someone*, what the Developer Assistant
> > [0] is.
> >
> > When I said something like: "...and you project is exported directly to
> > Git
- Original Message -
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > Actually I was going to ask the opposite question: Do we still need
> > FedoraHosted?
>
> I have found it a valuable service to provide an upstream home for fedora-
> specific projects.
Sure, it's a great home for fedora-specific u
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 05:52:07PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> I think freedom of the service does matter. The debacles with google
> reader and google talk recently should be pointing that up to all of
> us.
Don't forget Google Code removing downloads :-(
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Actually I was going to ask the opposite question: Do we still need
> FedoraHosted?
I have found it a valuable service to provide an upstream home for fedora-
specific projects.
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
HI
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 5:52 PM, seth vidal wrote:
>
>
> I actually disagree with that.
>
> I think freedom of the service does matter. The debacles with google
> reader and google talk recently should be pointing that up to all of
> us. While DVCS do remove the possibility of our code getting
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 16:39:20 -0400
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> >
> > Actually I was going to ask the opposite question: Do we still need
> > FedoraHosted? It was created before there was GitHub or Gitorious
> > but frankly we
Hi
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> Actually I was going to ask the opposite question: Do we still need
> FedoraHosted? It was created before there was GitHub or Gitorious but
> frankly we are not funded or staffed to make it bigger and better than it
> is now. Th
On Fri, 31 May 2013 23:19:50 +0200
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi all,
> few days ago I was explaining to someone*, what the Developer
> Assistant [0] is.
>
> When I said something like: "...and you project is exported directly
> to GitHub [1] if you want", the person I was talking to interrupted
> me
On 31 May 2013 15:19, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi all,
> few days ago I was explaining to someone*, what the Developer Assistant
> [0] is.
>
> When I said something like: "...and you project is exported directly to
> GitHub [1] if you want", the person I was talking to interrupted me and
> asked an
Hi all,
few days ago I was explaining to someone*, what the Developer Assistant
[0] is.
When I said something like: "...and you project is exported directly to
GitHub [1] if you want", the person I was talking to interrupted me and
asked an interesting question:
Why our own tools prefer a p
13 matches
Mail list logo
