> Still mdadm is not even compiling on current fc30.
> So no one cares that upcoming fc30 will deliver binaries from fc29?
I don't care enough to apply the Debian fix, perhaps the maintainer does.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675363#c4
On Fri, 2019-03-15 at 22:27 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 21:32, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > The Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting is next week:
> > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2019/3/21/#m9491
>
> Still mdadm is not even compiling on current fc30.
> S
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 21:32, Ben Cotton wrote:
> The Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting is next week:
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2019/3/21/#m9491
Still mdadm is not even compiling on current fc30.
So no one cares that upcoming fc30 will deliver binaries from fc29?
k
The Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting is next week:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2019/3/21/#m9491
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1656509
ACTION: libdnf maintainers to verify if an F29
