On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 1:38 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:56 PM wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 1:18 PM, Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> > > I requested testing on desktop@ and test@ lists earlier this week; so
> > > far that seems to suggest that this is failing for a
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:56 PM wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 1:18 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > I requested testing on desktop@ and test@ lists earlier this week; so
> > far that seems to suggest that this is failing for a lot of people on
> > a
> > lot of hardware...but it also fails the
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 1:18 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
I requested testing on desktop@ and test@ lists earlier this week; so
far that seems to suggest that this is failing for a lot of people on
a
lot of hardware...but it also fails the same way on F29 in most cases,
suggesting we shipped F29
On Fri, 2019-03-08 at 13:49 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> Accepted blockers
> -
> 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1656509 - libdnf - POST
> F29 to Rawhide (F30) upgrades fail, seems to be modularity-related
>
> Reassigned to DNF. Patch merged upstream to fix the issu
