On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 16:54 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 01:02:32PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > *was* an 'official' schedule with an earlier release date than the
> > actual one in each case. If anyone's as sadly nerdy as me, I can
> > provide specific references for
On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 18:29 +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote:
> 2018-04-26 22:02 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson :
> > On that basis, I'm gonna say FC1 was at least a day late from the
> > schedule in place a week before it came out,
>
> It even slipped 'officially':
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-
2018-04-26 22:02 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson :
> On that basis, I'm gonna say FC1 was at least a day late from the
> schedule in place a week before it came out,
It even slipped 'officially':
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2003-October/msg01178.html
:)
- Thomas
__
Wow, that is some serious digging, and good to know that we are on time :)
Hope we continue it for future releases.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:03 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 20:41 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > The Fedora_28_RC_1.1 compose [1] is considered as GOLD and it is g
Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> > For the record, I have determined to at least my own satisfaction that
> > this is the first *ever* on-time Fedora release. Go team!
>
> Ehh, release schedules are more like guidelines anyway... :)
In Fedora "guidelines" usually
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> For the record, I have determined to at least my own satisfaction that
> this is the first *ever* on-time Fedora release. Go team!
Ehh, release schedules are more like guidelines anyway... :)
--
Chris Adams
__
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 01:02:32PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> *was* an 'official' schedule with an earlier release date than the
> actual one in each case. If anyone's as sadly nerdy as me, I can
> provide specific references for each of these releases.
Um, yes please.
--
Matthew Miller
Fe
On to, 26 huhti 2018, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 20:41 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
The Fedora_28_RC_1.1 compose [1] is considered as GOLD and it is going
to be shipped on 2018-May-01 as Fedora 28 Final release.
For more information please check the meeting minutes [2] from the
Go/
On 2018-04-26 16:02, Adam Williamson wrote:
FC1 is the trickiest. I don't think any FC1 development schedule was
ever really made public. So for that one I got creative. There's an
article on LWN - written by Joe Brockmeier no less! - around the time
of the release:
https://lwn.net/Articles/5603
On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 13:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It was written on Wednesday 2018-10-29, and states in part:
>
> "With the first stable release of the Fedora Core scheduled for early
> next week..."
>
> Now, the release actually happened on 2018-11-05. Which *is* 'next
> week' from 201
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:03 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 20:41 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > The Fedora_28_RC_1.1 compose [1] is considered as GOLD and it is going
> > to be shipped on 2018-May-01 as Fedora 28 Final release.
> >
> > For more information please check the meetin
On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 20:41 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> The Fedora_28_RC_1.1 compose [1] is considered as GOLD and it is going
> to be shipped on 2018-May-01 as Fedora 28 Final release.
>
> For more information please check the meeting minutes [2] from the
> Go/No-Go meeting.
For the record, I have
The Fedora_28_RC_1.1 compose [1] is considered as GOLD and it is going
to be shipped on 2018-May-01 as Fedora 28 Final release.
For more information please check the meeting minutes [2] from the
Go/No-Go meeting.
[1] http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/28_RC-1.1/
[2]
https://meetbot.fedora
13 matches
Mail list logo
