Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-06-08 Thread Tim Lauridsen
On Wed, 27 May 2015 at 17:19 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:07:52PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > Having keywords makes the search functionality much > > > better, but isn't actually required for your application to be shown > > > in the software center. > > What would

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-06-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - > On 27 May 2015 at 16:19, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Richard, sorry for the dumb question, but is there a path to pull in > > keywords from ? Or, going the > > other way, can we get the Fedora apps team to highlight/prioritize

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-30 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 04:38:58PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 29 May 2015 at 15:57, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. I was thinking of something periodic > > rather than just once, though. > > Does anybody know the URL to get the tags for all packages? According

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-29 Thread Richard Hughes
On 29 May 2015 at 15:57, Matthew Miller wrote: > Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. I was thinking of something periodic > rather than just once, though. Does anybody know the URL to get the tags for all packages? Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorapr

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-29 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 02:45:51PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > Richard, sorry for the dumb question, but is there a path to pull in > > keywords from ? Or, going the > > other way, can we get the Fedora apps team to highlight/prioritize > > packages whic

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-29 Thread Richard Hughes
On 27 May 2015 at 16:19, Matthew Miller wrote: > Richard, sorry for the dumb question, but is there a path to pull in > keywords from ? Or, going the > other way, can we get the Fedora apps team to highlight/prioritize > packages which match applications on

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-27 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:07:52PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Having keywords makes the search functionality much > > better, but isn't actually required for your application to be shown > > in the software center. > What would they add that's not found within the RPM package %description >

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-27 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:11:55AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > Crazy idea... > Could keywords be pulled from tagger which have been upvoted to a > specific level? Hah, yes, this. :) -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedor

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-27 Thread Richard Shaw
Crazy idea... Could keywords be pulled from tagger which have been upvoted to a specific level? Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-27 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 27 May 2015 12:47:04 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > It's not only the "green" applications that make the cut, the amber > ones go in too. Okay. Glad to hear we're not supposed to "fix" something like that post release. > Having keywords makes the search functionality much > better, but i

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-27 Thread Richard Hughes
On 27 May 2015 at 11:57, Michael Schwendt wrote: > It kinda sucks that you list a "No keywords in .desktop file" warning > for almost all packages even if they meet the packaging guidelines and > the specific requirements of the F22 development cycle, i.e. running > "appstream-util validate-relax"

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-27 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 26 May 2015 16:33:19 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/screenshots/f22/matrix.html It kinda sucks that you list a "No keywords in .desktop file" warning for almost all packages even if they meet the packaging guidelines and the specific requirements of th

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-27 Thread Richard Hughes
On 27 May 2015 at 09:32, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > Is it GUI only or is there any chance to get at least TUI apps? Some > as mc are pretty popular even in the group of GUI only users. I think mc fails quite a few of the criteria: https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib/blob/master/README.md -- a

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-27 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - > Quite a few people are going to be installing Fedora 22 in the coming > days, searching for things in the software center and not finding > their esoteric GUI tool. This is because some applications still don’t > ship AppData files, which have become compulsory in the

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-26 Thread Richard Hughes
On 26 May 2015 at 22:10, Reindl Harald wrote: > you need learn to accept that software reaches the point where iot is just > *read yand finished* just because it does what it is supposed to do and > needs ntohing fixed or changed all the time I assume you can point to several high-quality desktop

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-26 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:10:55PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > >Yes, that shows you care as a packager and allows you to "rescue" > >otherwise unloved applications > who are you to define if an application is "loved" I think there is a language / cultural barrier here — I don't think Richard at

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-26 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 26.05.2015 um 22:48 schrieb Richard Hughes: On 26 May 2015 at 19:56, Hans de Goede wrote: What does "dead" in that table mean? I see a lot of games marked this way, and yes many games see little upstream activity, because once a game is finished it typically really is finished. Dead mean

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-26 Thread Richard Hughes
On 26 May 2015 at 19:56, Hans de Goede wrote: > What does "dead" in that table mean? I see a lot of games marked this way, > and yes many games see little upstream activity, because once a game is > finished it typically really is finished. Dead means "no upstream release in 5 years". > If I add

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-26 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 05/26/2015 05:33 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: Quite a few people are going to be installing Fedora 22 in the coming days, searching for things in the software center and not finding their esoteric GUI tool. This is because some applications still don’t ship AppData files, which have become c

Fedora 22 and missing applications

2015-05-26 Thread Richard Hughes
Quite a few people are going to be installing Fedora 22 in the coming days, searching for things in the software center and not finding their esoteric GUI tool. This is because some applications still don’t ship AppData files, which have become compulsory in the workstation spin for this release. L