If that could be made easier, that'd be awesome. Storage is cheap.
There should be a stock reply to that statement somewhere. IT support
staff seem to hear it a lot.
Besides the stuff Kevin listed, enterprize drives with good seek times
and transfer rates cost more than typical consumer dri
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:51:57 -0500 (EST)
"David A. Wheeler" wrote:
> Reproducing the exact build environment, when I tried to do it years
> ago, turned out to be practically impossible and not just "difficult".
There was a recent effort on this:
https://github.com/kholia/ReproducibleBuilds
> I
> for each mirror. Some will keep those repos for longer, some shorter.
Matthew Miller then declared:
> To: Stanislav Ochotnicky
> Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora
> ,Cool Other Package Repositories
>
> Subject: Re: Fedora 18 End of Life
> Mes
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:44:34AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > If someone else uses GPLed binaries from a COPR repo and fulfills
> > their source obligations by pointing to the repository we host, it's
> > technically their problem if our repository goes away, but it would
> > be a friendly gestu
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:33:48 -0500
Matthew Miller wrote:
> If someone else uses GPLed binaries from a COPR repo and fulfills
> their source obligations by pointing to the repository we host, it's
> technically their problem if our repository goes away, but it would
> be a friendly gesture to at l
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 05:24:04PM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> > gesture to at least keep the source RPMs around.
> The thing is those copr repos will likely depend on EOLed Fedora
> repos. Do we keep *those* around? I guess the answer will be different
> for each mirror. Some will keep th
Matthew Miller writes:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:16:44AM +0100, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
>> While the last option is probably best, I'm not sure if this is
>> worth the effort. How many people will appreciate having archived
>> old repos?
>
> If someone else uses GPLed binaries from a COPR repo a
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:16:44AM +0100, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> While the last option is probably best, I'm not sure if this is
> worth the effort. How many people will appreciate having archived
> old repos?
If someone else uses GPLed binaries from a COPR repo and fulfills their
source obligati
- Original Message -
> On 01/16/2014 09:05 AM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> > I'm still unsure what it will mean for existing Fedora 18 repository. I
> > you want to discuss it, you are welcome to copr-devel@ mailing list.
>
> So in 3 months I had to come with some solution what to do with old
On 01/16/2014 09:05 AM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
I'm still unsure what it will mean for existing Fedora 18 repository. I
you want to discuss it, you are welcome to copr-devel@ mailing list.
So in 3 months I had to come with some solution what to do with old
repositories. Options which comes to my
On 01/14/2014 10:31 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
As of 14th January 2014, Fedora 18 has reached its end of life for
updates and support. No further updates, including security updates,
will be available for Fedora 18. A previous reminder was sent on
December 18th [0].
How does this affect Copr?
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As of 14th January 2014, Fedora 18 has reached its end of life for
updates and support. No further updates, including security updates,
will be available for Fedora 18. A previous reminder was sent on
December 18th [0].
Fedora 19 will continue to rece
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings.
This is a reminder email about the end of life process for Fedora 18.
Fedora 18 will reach end of life on 2014-01-14, and no further updates
will be pushed out after that time. Additionally, with the recent
release of Fedora 20, no new p
13 matches
Mail list logo
