On 01/08/2013 08:13 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:07 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
Surely we must have some kind of "omg we cant release with this
component in final it's utterly broken or posses security risk!" fail
safe mechanism in place to deal with this?
Do any o
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:07 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
>>> Surely we must have some kind of "omg we cant release with this
>>> component in final it's utterly broken or posses security risk!" fail
>>> safe mechanism in place to deal with this?
>>
>> Do any of these packages pose a high sec
On 01/08/2013 07:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:39:10 +
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
This may come as an completely stupid question but given that we have
not released yet why cant we remove those packages?
Because we are in the very last stages of final freeze.
Any ch
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:39:10 +
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> This may come as an completely stupid question but given that we have
> not released yet why cant we remove those packages?
Because we are in the very last stages of final freeze.
Any changes at all can cause consequences we c
On 01/08/2013 03:48 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 03:06 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
So the remaining webapps that ship with the broken configuration that we
are about to release into the hands our our enduser ba
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 21:02 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 04:48:36 +0100
> Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 03:06 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > >> So the remaining webapps that ship wit
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 04:48:36 +0100
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 03:06 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >> So the remaining webapps that ship with the broken configuration
> >> that we are about to release into th
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 03:06:14 +
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 02:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
...snip...
> > Well, I'm not sure that was a great precedent to set, if we're
> > going to treat it as a precedent...
>
> What else is it?
A single decision?
I can't speak for
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 03:06 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> So the remaining webapps that ship with the broken configuration that we
>> are about to release into the hands our our enduser base and how they
>> should be handled are n
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 03:06 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 02:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 01:56 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >> On 01/07/2013 10:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>> Why? What can FESCo do about it? We don't need to kick e
On 01/08/2013 02:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 01:56 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 01/07/2013 10:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Why? What can FESCo do about it? We don't need to kick every damn issue
to FESCo, as seems to be a trend lately.
Ah I see but it's ok
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 01:56 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 01/07/2013 10:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Why? What can FESCo do about it? We don't need to kick every damn issue
> > to FESCo, as seems to be a trend lately.
>
> Ah I see but it's ok when you do...
What have I escalated
On 01/07/2013 10:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Why? What can FESCo do about it? We don't need to kick every damn issue
to FESCo, as seems to be a trend lately.
Ah I see but it's ok when you do...
There's no high-level technical
decision to be made here. The bugs just need to get fixed. FESC
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 15:47 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 01/07/2013 02:54 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
> > 2 months ago I have open a bug tracker for all packages with an apache
> > configuration file, which need to be fixed to work with httpd 2.4.
> >
> > The current situation, 1 week befo
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:54:23 +0100
Remi Collet wrote:
> 2 months ago I have open a bug tracker for all packages with an apache
> configuration file, which need to be fixed to work with httpd 2.4.
>
> The current situation, 1 week before release, don't seems really good,
> see
> https://bugzilla.
On 01/07/2013 02:54 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
2 months ago I have open a bug tracker for all packages with an apache
configuration file, which need to be fixed to work with httpd 2.4.
The current situation, 1 week before release, don't seems really good,
see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependen
2 months ago I have open a bug tracker for all packages with an apache
configuration file, which need to be fixed to work with httpd 2.4.
The current situation, 1 week before release, don't seems really good,
see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=871373&hide_resolved=1
16 pack
17 matches
Mail list logo
