On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 13:03 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 7/7/10 1:01 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > I can think of one quick and simple way of doing this.
> >
> > When we review a bug and accept it on the blocker list, we use a keyword
> > of
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 13:13 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 7/7/10 1:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > keywords we have to ask to be added to the system, I'm not keen on doing
> > that as a temp hack. Whiteboard space is freeform, though. We cou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/7/10 1:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> keywords we have to ask to be added to the system, I'm not keen on doing
> that as a temp hack. Whiteboard space is freeform, though. We could just
> pick a word to use in the whiteboard space - AcceptedBlock
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 13:01 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 7/7/10 5:43 AM, James Laska wrote:
> > If there is a solution that addresses the problems identified during
> > F-13, and it can be implemented in *short* time. It would be
> > compell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/7/10 1:01 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> I can think of one quick and simple way of doing this.
>
> When we review a bug and accept it on the blocker list, we use a keyword
> of "ACCEPTED" or some such. That way any bug without the word is
> assumed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/7/10 5:43 AM, James Laska wrote:
> If there is a solution that addresses the problems identified during
> F-13, and it can be implemented in *short* time. It would be
> compelling. I'm a fan of solving problems with tooling, but I'm not
> convin
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 12:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 7/6/10 5:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:10 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> >> Hard to believe, but Fedora QA starts its "Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance
> >> Tes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/6/10 5:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:10 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
>> Hard to believe, but Fedora QA starts its "Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance
>> Test Plan" testing this Thursday (2010-07-08).
>>
>> We've run out of tim
James Laska said the following on 07/07/2010 05:43 AM Pacific Time:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:10 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
>>> Hard to believe, but Fedora QA starts its "Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance
>>> Test Plan" testing this Thursday
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:10 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> > Hard to believe, but Fedora QA starts its "Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance
> > Test Plan" testing this Thursday (2010-07-08).
> >
> > We've run out of time and run way to implement
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:10 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> Hard to believe, but Fedora QA starts its "Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance
> Test Plan" testing this Thursday (2010-07-08).
>
> We've run out of time and run way to implement a new means of tracking
> blocker bugs for Fedora--previously disc
Hard to believe, but Fedora QA starts its "Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance
Test Plan" testing this Thursday (2010-07-08).
We've run out of time and run way to implement a new means of tracking
blocker bugs for Fedora--previously discussed in the context of using
flags in Bugzilla. We'll continue
12 matches
Mail list logo
