Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> This implies that you rarely do package reviews. Busted!! :)
I usually use scratch builds for reviews. Only quick reviews of dependency
chains need local builds.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
Frank Büttner wrote:
> I have done some like at my first package, and then to my was spoken,
> that I use local mock and not the infrastructure. But after some updates
> of mock, mock it now dead. The no response from them maintainer.
Don't worry, even I get away with my intensive use of Koji. ;-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/30/2010 11:51 AM, Frank Büttner wrote:
> Am 30.01.2010 11:23, schrieb Alexander Kahl:
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>> On 01/30/2010 10:59 AM, Frank Büttner wrote:
>>> until bug #479556 is not fixed, I can't build anything.
>>> And the maintainer of mock seem
Am 30.01.2010 11:23, schrieb Alexander Kahl:
> Hi Frank,
>
> On 01/30/2010 10:59 AM, Frank Büttner wrote:
>> until bug #479556 is not fixed, I can't build anything.
>> And the maintainer of mock seem don't do anything to fix it.
>> I don't know why. But for my last post I don't get any response.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Frank,
On 01/30/2010 10:59 AM, Frank Büttner wrote:
> until bug #479556 is not fixed, I can't build anything.
> And the maintainer of mock seem don't do anything to fix it.
> I don't know why. But for my last post I don't get any response.
why don'
Hi all,
Frank Büttner seems reluctant to be responsive.
I fixed one FTBFS bug assigned to him in qtiplot.
I posted a non responsive maintainer tracker bug, but he closed soon and was
reluctant to explain anymore.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557424
?And he was total non-resp
