Dear Kevin
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 8:13 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
> > Given that the ENGINE API is deprecated upstream since OpenSSL 3.0, the
> > API is optional upstream, and its use has produced compiler warnings
> > since it was introdu
Joe Orton wrote:
> Given that the ENGINE API is deprecated upstream since OpenSSL 3.0, the
> API is optional upstream, and its use has produced compiler warnings
> since it was introduced in Fedora 36, it seems perfectly reasonable to
> disable this API in Fedora 41.
I disagree. Disabling an API t
Dear Zbyszek,
Thanks, I updated the Wiki page correspondingly.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 5:56 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> [Replying to two mails at once to conserve some electrons.]
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:03:31PM +0200, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> > Thanks. I
[Replying to two mails at once to conserve some electrons.]
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:03:31PM +0200, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> Thanks. In the period between the proposal was written and published the
> TPM2 provider has landed in Fedora.
> PKCS#11 provider is already here for a while.
>
> Should
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 09:50:27AM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
> There will always be some effort related to such a transition, but
> that effort will have to happen one way or the other eventually. I
> suspect if Fedora decides to keep ENGINE support, we’ll have the exact
> same discussion in a
Hi,
> On 2. Apr 2024, at 16:31, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> The fact that such packages are physically present is not enough - they need
> to implement all the needed features, and they need to be mature enough to
> just work out of the box. Neither of these are true today, and providers just
>
Dear Gary,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 5:39 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:12 PM Dmitry Belyavskiy
> wrote:
>
> > Third-party engines may be a problem but as we don't break ABI, it's not
> a problem of the moment.
>
> The fact you are removing the headers means it is
> a proble
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:12 PM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> Third-party engines may be a problem but as we don't break ABI, it's not a
> problem of the moment.
The fact you are removing the headers means it is
a problem for 3rd party engines who build from
source (and everyone should at least occ
Dear Luca
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 4:32 PM Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Hi Zbigniew!
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 1:15 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> > zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thanks. In the period between the proposal was written and published the
> > TPM2 provider has landed in
> Hi Zbigniew!
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 1:15 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks. In the period between the proposal was written and published the
> TPM2 provider has landed in Fedora.
> PKCS#11 provider is already here for a while.
The fact that such p
Hi Zbigniew!
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 1:15 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 10:45:32AM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > == Summary ==
> > We disable building the packages using ENGINE API in OpenSSL without
> > breaking ABI.
>
> "Without breaking A
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 10:45:32AM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> == Summary ==
> We disable building the packages using ENGINE API in OpenSSL without
> breaking ABI.
"Without breaking ABI" is a improvement.
Everything else — not so much.
> == Detailed Description ==
> We are going to deprecate Op
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpensslDeprecateEngine
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implement
13 matches
Mail list logo
