Steve Grubb writes:
> On Monday, June 26, 2023 2:47:01 PM EDT Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 5:15 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibuserDeprecation
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the
Hi,
I went through the thread and there are good points that I was not aware
of. But libuser is now pulled into every installation and considering the
state of the library (not being developed) I still think we should do
something about it. The benefit is small for tools like passwd.
The passwd u
On Monday, 26 June 2023 at 03:16, James Ralston wrote:
[...]
> To remove a user from a group:
>
> lgroupmod -m someuser somegroup
[...]
> But groupmod has no ability to remove a user from a group.
[...]
> For shadow-utils 4.10 or later, usermod has a new -r option, so it is
> possible to const
On Monday, June 26, 2023 2:47:01 PM EDT Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 5:15 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> >
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibuserDeprecation
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> > process, proposals a
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 5:15 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibuserDeprecation
>
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 07:40:50AM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibuserDeprecation
> ...
> > == Scope ==
> > * Proposal owners: Dropping the package, move it to EPEL eventually
>
> If it's not in Fedora it can't be in EPEL (once dropped), can it?
Sure
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 3:17 AM James Ralston wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:33 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
>
> > The main benefit is to decrease the maintenance and packaging work
> > on library that does not bring much value while the functionality is
> > provided by another components.
>
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibuserDeprecation
...
> == Scope ==
> * Proposal owners: Dropping the package, move it to EPEL eventually
If it's not in Fedora it can't be in EPEL (once dropped), can it?
There may also be a language issue here: Does the CP owner mean
"possibly/maybe"?
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:33 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> The main benefit is to decrease the maintenance and packaging work
> on library that does not bring much value while the functionality is
> provided by another components.
On most (all?) Linux distributions, Puppet relies on libuser in orde
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 12:14:28 PM EDT Aoife Moloney wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibuserDeprecation
>
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibuserDeprecation
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Comm
11 matches
Mail list logo
