On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 8:52 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 2:24 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, I think the upstream renaming of ansible and ansible-core is something
> > that we just have to accept. But we have some flexibility in how this is
> > p
>> The Change proposal is not very clear in this regard… Please correct me
> if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that there's a giant SRPM which
> produces a giant 'ansible' binary package. In addition there's a second
> small SRPM which produces the 'ansible-core' binary package.
>
> Right:
>
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 06:24:21AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> FWIW, I think the upstream renaming of ansible and ansible-core is something
> that we just have to accept. But we have some flexibility in how this is
> packaged in Fedora.
...snip...
>
> The Change proposal is not ver
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 2:24 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> FWIW, I think the upstream renaming of ansible and ansible-core is something
> that we just have to accept. But we have some flexibility in how this is
> packaged in Fedora.
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 09:34:34PM -, David M
FWIW, I think the upstream renaming of ansible and ansible-core is something
that we just have to accept. But we have some flexibility in how this is
packaged in Fedora.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 09:34:34PM -, David Moreau-Simard wrote:
[> Richard Meggins wrote:]
> > * Produce multiple RPM pa
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 3:36 PM David Moreau-Simard
wrote:
> (replying from hyperkitty as I'm not subscribed to fedora-devel, hopefully
> this works)
>
> > How about this:
> >
> > * Have a single ansible dist git repo with a single spec file
> > * The source would be https://pypi.org/projec
(replying from hyperkitty as I'm not subscribed to fedora-devel, hopefully this
works)
> How about this:
>
> * Have a single ansible dist git repo with a single spec file
> * The source would be https://pypi.org/project/ansible/
There couldn't be a single source because 'ansible' and 'ans
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:39 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:22 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 08:51:46PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I have a couple comments/questions about this change.
> > >
> > > How
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:22 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 08:51:46PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have a couple comments/questions about this change.
> >
> > How will this effect EPEL? Is the plan to keep Ansible 2.9 there for
> > now?
>
>
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 08:51:46PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have a couple comments/questions about this change.
>
> How will this effect EPEL? Is the plan to keep Ansible 2.9 there for
> now?
For now yes, but 2.9 will go EOL at the end of the year (last I heard).
On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 16:31 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5
>
> == Summary ==
>
> The ansible project has re-organized how they release and distribute
> ansible. This change moves Fedora to be in sync with those changes
> and
> retires the old 'ansible c
Hi Nico,
I understand your frustration about the Ansible reorganization, and I
agree that they could have documented it better, but I think that you
are missing the context surrounding this decision.
Oct 16, 2021 4:46:43 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia :
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 3:03 PM Gordon Messmer
>
Hi,
On Sat, 2021-10-16 at 15:33 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:02:38AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > it could have made good sense, and still would, for the "ansible"
> > package to be what is now being colloquially referred to as
> > "ansible-core", but for whic
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 10:02:38AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> it could have made good sense, and still would, for the "ansible"
> package to be what is now being colloquially referred to as
> "ansible-core", but for which the published upstream git repo is still
> https://github.com/ansib
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 05:45:47PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> They *can* physically, but doing both together would get very silly.
> I'd meant "do one or the other". The current model of "install
> ansible, get a few Megabytes of material you actually use that is
> almost entirely in ansi
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 3:03 PM Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 10/15/21 16:29, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > I would publish ansible-core as just that, with a "Provides: ansible
> > %{version{-%{release}" and even "Obsoletes: ansible >= %{version}".
> ...
> > The "ansible" package could be a
> >
On 10/15/21 16:29, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
I would publish ansible-core as just that, with a "Provides: ansible
%{version{-%{release}" and even "Obsoletes: ansible >= %{version}".
...
The "ansible" package could be a
meta package with "Requires: ansible-core ansible_collections" to
avoid the
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 8:04 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 11:39 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:44:12PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 7:29 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 11:39 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:44:12PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 7:29 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cha
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:44:12PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 7:29 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
> > > The ansible pro
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 7:29 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > The ansible project has re-organized how they release and distribute
> > ansible. This change moves
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5
>
> == Summary ==
>
> The ansible project has re-organized how they release and distribute
> ansible. This change moves Fedora to be in sync with those changes and
> retires the old 'ansible class
The subject is wrong. This Change proposal is for Fedora Linux *36*. Whoops!
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5
== Summary ==
The ansible project has re-organized how they release and distribute
ansible. This change moves Fedora to be in sync with those changes and
retires the old 'ansible classic/2.9.x' package in favor of a
'ansible' package that pulls in a
24 matches
Mail list logo
