Hello Timotheus,
the mono crashes during build process on ppc64. For more details please
take a look
at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225035
Than
Am 18.05.2015 um 13:50 schrieb Timotheus Pokorra:
Hello Dan,
first update
srpm builds fine on f22/s390x
mono segfaults when runn
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy wrote:
>> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
>> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
>
> Most of these are now built, sadly because all the bits needed weren't
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy wrote:
> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
Most of these are now built, sadly because all the bits needed weren't
actually committed it wasn't as simple as running a script.
Th
Hello Neal,
> So we won't have mono stuff working for F22 then?
I have installed a fresh Fedora 21, and then upgraded to F22 according
to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_21_-.3E_Fedora_22_.28not_yet_released.29
I then did dnf install mono-core.
rpm -qa | grep m
> Now, is it our task as the change owners to update each and every
> package that depends on Mono?
> We have done a lot of preparation work, but would welcome the package
> owners to review our changes to the spec files and import them into
> their packages...
> Does it work like that?
Procedural
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Peter Robinson
wrote:
> >> >> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
> >> >> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Thanks.
> >> >> --
> >> >> devel mailing list
> >> >> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> >> https:/
>> >> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
>> >> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
>> >>
>> >> -Thanks.
>> >> --
>> >> devel mailing list
>> >> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> >> Fedora Code of Cond
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Peter Robinson
wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Moez Roy wrote:
> >>
> >> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
> >> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
> >>
> >
> Do you intend to build and support mono4 in EPEL? Which versions. If
> you've not done in EPEL it doesn't magically appear. Similarly you'll
> need to file a ticket in the releng trac instance to get a side tag
> for this.
>
> I strongly suggest you get it built and all sorted out in rawhide with
Hello Peter,
> It can, partially, but for the maintainers to know about your changes
> you need to file bug reports in bugzilla, I suggest also you have a
> mono4 tracking bug for all the bugs to block so it's easy for people
> to track the status and help out as it's a central location.
Good to k
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Timotheus Pokorra
wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
>> I've rebuilt a few packages in the f23-mono4 side tag, some are broken
>> which causes some others to have failures, you'll need to fix/update
>> nant/dbus-sharp. I'm also rebuilding mono itself as a post boostrap
>> bu
>> Either way it looks like there is still quite a bit of work for the
>> change owners to do before we can tag anything over to f23.
>>
>> Peter
>
> Thanks for looking into this and creating that tag f23-mono4
>
> I received about 60 emails about failing packages.
>
> Claudio and myself have alrea
Hello Peter,
> I've rebuilt a few packages in the f23-mono4 side tag, some are broken
> which causes some others to have failures, you'll need to fix/update
> nant/dbus-sharp. I'm also rebuilding mono itself as a post boostrap
> build.
Just for me as clarification: so is the bootstrap process fin
Hello Dan,
> first update
> srpm builds fine on f22/s390x
> mono segfaults when running monolite on f22/ppc64
> build runs well on f22/ppc64le (new arch) after adding ppc64le to the
> ExclusiveArch list
Thanks for trying it!
I have added ppc64le in the spec file to the ExclusiveArch list.
I wonde
Hello Peter,
>> Peter, do you have a list what will be rebuilt?
>
> Not really, I would expect this to be provided by the Change owners.
>
> The core bits I've looked at are:
> graphviz
> avahi
>
> As they impact the rest of the distro.
>
> and a few other packages. There appears to be problems wi
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2015 09:57:14 +0100
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Peter Robinson
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy
>> > wrote:
>> >> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a
On Mon, 18 May 2015 09:57:14 +0100
Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy
> > wrote:
> >> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
> >> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
>
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy wrote:
>> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
>> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
>
> I've rebuilt a few packages in the f23-mono4 side tag, some are broken
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy wrote:
> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
I've rebuilt a few packages in the f23-mono4 side tag, some are broken
which causes some others to have failures, you'll need to fix/u
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy wrote:
>> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
>> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
>
> I've untagged this, it needs to be done on a side tag and then tagged i
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Moez Roy wrote:
>>
>> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
>> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
>>
>> -Thanks.
>> --
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy wrote:
> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
I've untagged this, it needs to be done on a side tag and then tagged in.
Peter
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
>> > as Mono 4 adds support for the ppc64le architecture (and aarch64
>> > support was probably added earlier), we (the Secondary arches team)
>> > would like to see a full bootstrap and subsequent update of %
>> > mono_arches
>> >
>> > For any questions regarding secondary arches, please don't hes
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Timotheus Pokorra
wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> I was made aware on IRC, that Claudio or myself should answer this question.
>
>> as Mono 4 adds support for the ppc64le architecture (and aarch64
>> support was probably added earlier), we (the Secondary arches team)
>> w
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Moez Roy wrote:
> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
>
> -Thanks.
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fed
Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
rebuild all the packages that require mono.
-Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Tue, 12 May 2015 14:59:11 +0200
Timotheus Pokorra wrote:
> > what we (in secondary arches) primarily need is the decision how to
> > proceed - incremental rebuild over 3.4 or complete rebootstrap.
> > Naturally we prefer the complete rebootstrap as it allows bringing
> > up new arches. And bec
> btw, the monolite binary is a native binary prebuilt for x86 only or
> can it be easily built also for other arches?
according to http://www.mono-project.com/docs/compiling-mono/compiling-from-git/
this should work: make get-monolite-latest
Also have a look at
http://www.mono-project.com/docs/ab
> what we (in secondary arches) primarily need is the decision how to
> proceed - incremental rebuild over 3.4 or complete rebootstrap.
> Naturally we prefer the complete rebootstrap as it allows bringing up
> new arches. And because we are in no way Mono experts, we would
> appreciate the procedur
Hello,
>> So, I guess the failure needs to be resolved first.
>
> Upstream has fixed it and you can pull in their patch.
>
> https://github.com/mono/mono/commit/16ee0252305fbd4f40ea39c3c4421dc7f103f8a0
I have now applied this patch, and it builds on Copr:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/tpok
On Tue, 12 May 2015 13:42:46 +0200
Timotheus Pokorra wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> I was made aware on IRC, that Claudio or myself should answer this
> question.
>
> > as Mono 4 adds support for the ppc64le architecture (and aarch64
> > support was probably added earlier), we (the Secondary arches te
W dniu 12.05.2015 o 13:42, Timotheus Pokorra pisze:
as Mono 4 adds support for the ppc64le architecture (and aarch64
support was probably added earlier), we (the Secondary arches team)
would like to see a full bootstrap and subsequent update of %mono_arches
For any questions regarding secondary
On Tue, 12 May 2015 13:42:46 +0200
Timotheus Pokorra wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> I was made aware on IRC, that Claudio or myself should answer this
> question.
>
> > as Mono 4 adds support for the ppc64le architecture (and aarch64
> > support was probably added earlier), we (the Secondary arches te
Hello Dan,
I was made aware on IRC, that Claudio or myself should answer this question.
> as Mono 4 adds support for the ppc64le architecture (and aarch64
> support was probably added earlier), we (the Secondary arches team)
> would like to see a full bootstrap and subsequent update of %mono_arch
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Juan Orti Alcaine
wrote:
> El 2015-05-04 11:02, Jan Kurik escribió:
>>
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 4 =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_4
>>
>> Change owner(s): Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra Diaz
>>
>>
>
> Thanks for pushing forward this change.
On 05/04/2015 01:20 PM, Jaromir Capik wrote:
So, I guess the failure needs to be resolved first.
Hi,
Wine-mono maintainer here.
Upstream has fixed it and you can pull in their patch.
https://github.com/mono/mono/commit/16ee0252305fbd4f40ea39c3c4421dc7f103f8a0
Regards,
Michael
--
devel mail
Hello everone.
> From: "Stephen Gallagher"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 2:32:46 PM
> Subject: Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4
>
> So I don't really see any problem with bootstrapping it once with
> monolite and then re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dne 4.5.2015 v 14:32 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 05:02 -0400, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 4 =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_4
> ...
>> * Make a one time exception of the rule for
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 05:02 -0400, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 4 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_4
...
> * Make a one time exception of the rule for build mono 4.0.1-1 using
> monolite, later make mono depend again on it self and rebuild mono
> 4.0.1-2 u
On Mon, 4 May 2015 05:02:29 -0400 (EDT)
Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 4 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_4
>
> Change owner(s): Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra Diaz
>
>
> Update the Mono stack in Fedora from 2.10 to 4.*
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> Support
El 2015-05-04 11:02, Jan Kurik escribió:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 4 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_4
Change owner(s): Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra Diaz
Thanks for pushing forward this change.
A sponsor will be needed to help Claudio join the packagers group. This
pac
= Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 4 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_4
Change owner(s): Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra Diaz
Update the Mono stack in Fedora from 2.10 to 4.*
== Detailed Description ==
Support for Mono versions 3.0 and 2.10 is been discontinued. No further
development o
42 matches
Mail list logo
