hi
This brings up a very good point. Why wasn't some kind of user feedback
not developed for gnome 3.18? Now I am still waiting for gnome 3.18 to
hit arch, and my fedora rawhide instal doesn't have it yet, so this
could've been added, but I doubt it having checked the commit logs and
news files. I
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 00:40:24 -0400, Eric Griffith wrote:
> But that's just happening, there's no user interaction. The user isnt
> waiting on it. Software, on the other hand, is being asked "Hey can you
> check for updates?" And then not displaying the feedback the user was
> expecting until it
On Sep 30, 2015 12:22 AM, "Ben Boeckel" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Sep, 2015 at 17:08:17 GMT, Eric Griffith wrote:
> > update system-- yum never downloaded the packages as part of the check,
DNF
> > doesn't, App Store / Play Store don't download as part of a check,
Windows
> > Update doesn't
>
> That's
On Tue, 29 Sep, 2015 at 17:08:17 GMT, Eric Griffith wrote:
> update system-- yum never downloaded the packages as part of the check, DNF
> doesn't, App Store / Play Store don't download as part of a check, Windows
> Update doesn't
That's not exactly true anymore for Windows.
http://arstechni
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:32:51 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> We only do the auto-refresh on wired or wifi connections. If you chose
> to do the manual refresh button on mobile data that's up to the user.
My ADSL connection (in the UK) is metered which is why I've masked off
all the dnf systemd stu
...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Richard Hughes
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 11:33 AM
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: Re: F22: Software for update
On 29 September 2015 at 18:08, Eric Griffith wrote:
> That seems like a really bad idea..
The alternative is
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 22:26 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> I don't see anything in that which says it detects wifi tethering.
> > 'capture portal detection' is something else, and exposing whether
> > a
> > connection is metered or not through the API is nice, but doesn't
> > mean
> > the informatio
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 01:20:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Is there a reliable way to detect that though? If I tether via my
> > > > phone or
> > > > turn my phone into a hotspot it comes up as Ethernet or WiFi,
> > > > respectively.
> > > > It seems like we are going to run
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 21:53 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:21:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 14:38 -0400, Eric Griffith wrote:
> > > There's also the fact that if
> > > > > the connection is metered then we just ripped through a chunk
> > > > >
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:21:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 14:38 -0400, Eric Griffith wrote:
> > There's also the fact that if
> > > > the connection is metered then we just ripped through a chunk of
> > > > their
> > data.
> > >
> > > We only do the auto-refresh on w
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 14:38 -0400, Eric Griffith wrote:
> There's also the fact that if
> > > the connection is metered then we just ripped through a chunk of
> > > their
> data.
> >
> > We only do the auto-refresh on wired or wifi connections. If you
> > chose
> > to do the manual refresh button
On Sep 29, 2015 1:32 PM, "Richard Hughes" wrote:
>
> On 29 September 2015 at 18:08, Eric Griffith
wrote:
> > That seems like a really bad idea..
>
> The alternative is we have a "download" stage, which means we can't do
> the blue "restart and update" action as it would download for a few
> minut
On 29 September 2015 at 18:08, Eric Griffith wrote:
> That seems like a really bad idea..
The alternative is we have a "download" stage, which means we can't do
the blue "restart and update" action as it would download for a few
minutes, and then randomly reboot when you had just started doing
so
2015-09-29 14:08 GMT-03:00 Eric Griffith :
> That seems like a really bad idea.. The icon for "check for updates" gives
> off the perception of "check" or "refresh", I would not assume either of
> those actions would actually download the updates. It leads to a bad user
> experience, as evident abo
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Richard Hughes
wrote:
> On 29 September 2015 at 14:50, Eric Griffith
> wrote:
> > Installing applications is fine but updates always seem to take two-three
> > times as long to display available updates vs me running "dnf update" and
> > getting a package list b
2015-09-29 10:50 GMT-03:00 Eric Griffith :
> Gnome Software definitely needs some love on the performance side of things.
> Installing applications is fine but updates always seem to take two-three
> times as long to display available updates vs me running "dnf update" and
> getting a package list
On 29 September 2015 at 14:50, Eric Griffith wrote:
> Installing applications is fine but updates always seem to take two-three
> times as long to display available updates vs me running "dnf update" and
> getting a package list back.
gnome-software is actually depsolving and downloading the upda
Gnome Software definitely needs some love on the performance side of
things. Installing applications is fine but updates always seem to take
two-three times as long to display available updates vs me running "dnf
update" and getting a package list back. Not sure if dnf is just that much
faster or i
Hi
The software for update on system is bug, because, I loading more five
minutes to show packages no messages, still loading...I tested many
times.
I use 'dnf update', not interface.
Albino
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/
19 matches
Mail list logo
