On 08/08/13 12:50, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2013-08-08, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 08/08/13 10:01, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Just like Seth's script it has a few obviously problems as for really
correct build ordering you need to flip-flop between srpms/specfiles and
binary rpms, but that will need a bit o
On 2013-08-08, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 08/08/13 10:01, Phil Knirsch wrote:
>>
>> Just like Seth's script it has a few obviously problems as for really
>> correct build ordering you need to flip-flop between srpms/specfiles and
>> binary rpms, but that will need a bit of a different approach. As i
On 08/08/13 10:01, Phil Knirsch wrote:
On 08/07/2013 10:56 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 08/07/2013 03:01 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 13:39:31 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 11:10 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 08/07/2013 10:56 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 08/07/2013 03:01 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 13:39:31 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 11:10 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:23:51 + (UT
On 08/08/13 03:47, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 10:43 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Just a note, I find my package's deps have magic requires for
5.16.2(not 5.16.3), does it mean that this has not rebuilded since
f19? Why?
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5588/5735
On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 10:43 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Just a note, I find my package's deps have magic requires for
> 5.16.2(not 5.16.3), does it mean that this has not rebuilded since
> f19? Why?
>
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5588/5735588/root.log
It means they failed
Just a note, I find my package's deps have magic requires for
5.16.2(not 5.16.3), does it mean that this has not rebuilded since
f19? Why?
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5588/5735588/root.log
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On 07/08/13 09:56, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 08/07/2013 03:01 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 13:39:31 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 11:10 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:23:51 + (UTC)
Pe
On 08/07/2013 03:01 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 13:39:31 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 11:10 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:23:51 + (UTC)
Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2013-06-12, Kevin Fenzi
On 08/06/2013 10:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 22:52 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Adam Williamson [06/08/2013 13:43] :
perl-Test-Refcount-0:0.07-8.fc19.noarch
This module doesn't build against perl 5.18.x (so please stop
trying to do it, folks).
This is https://rt.c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 13:39:31 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 11:10 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:23:51 + (UTC)
> > Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > > On 2013-06-12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > So, there's no
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 13:57:42 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 22:52 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > * Adam Williamson [06/08/2013 13:43] :
> > >
> > > perl-Test-Refcount-0:0.07-8.fc19.noarch
> >
> > This module doesn't build against perl 5.18.x (so please stop
> > trying to
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 22:52 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Adam Williamson [06/08/2013 13:43] :
> >
> > perl-Test-Refcount-0:0.07-8.fc19.noarch
>
> This module doesn't build against perl 5.18.x (so please stop
> trying to do it, folks).
>
> This is https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?i
* Adam Williamson [06/08/2013 13:43] :
>
> perl-Test-Refcount-0:0.07-8.fc19.noarch
This module doesn't build against perl 5.18.x (so please stop
trying to do it, folks).
This is https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=85998
Emmanuel
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/w
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> repoquery turns up these things that require either
> perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) , perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.1) ,
> perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) or perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) :
>
> polymake-0:2.12-7.fc20.x86_64
>
Don't try to rebuild this
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 13:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 11:10 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:23:51 + (UTC)
> > Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > > On 2013-06-12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > So, there's nothing preventing the side tag and rebuild anytime
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 11:10 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:23:51 + (UTC)
> Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> > On 2013-06-12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > So, there's nothing preventing the side tag and rebuild anytime now
> > > right? 5.18.0 is out, so we could start that work in rawhid
On 06/13/2013 03:23 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> AFAIK, ld-linux.so prevents from this by reusing the first libperl.so
addreses. However I have no idea if this is true for dlopen(). Do we get
two interpreters with two sets of global variables?
I'm not sure if it's good—it tends to cause random cras
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:23:51 + (UTC)
Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2013-06-12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > So, there's nothing preventing the side tag and rebuild anytime now
> > right? 5.18.0 is out, so we could start that work in rawhide?=20
> >
> Currently 5.18.0 does not pass one test when running i
On 2013-06-12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, there's nothing preventing the side tag and rebuild anytime now
> right? 5.18.0 is out, so we could start that work in rawhide?=20
>
Currently 5.18.0 does not pass one test when running in mock and koji.
(It's because of the terminal usage in tested perl deb
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:48:16 +0200
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > So, there's nothing preventing the side tag and rebuild anytime now
> > right? 5.18.0 is out, so we could start that work in rawhide?
>
> Is there such a rush? I don't think one w
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, there's nothing preventing the side tag and rebuild anytime now
> right? 5.18.0 is out, so we could start that work in rawhide?
Is there such a rush? I don't think one week to discuss this and
figure out various corner cases is too much.
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:56:32 +0200
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Perl 5.18 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18
>
> Change owner(s): Petr Písař , Jitka Plesníková
>
>
> A new perl 5.18 version brings a lot of changes done over a year of
> development.
= Proposed System Wide Change: Perl 5.18 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18
Change owner(s): Petr Písař , Jitka Plesníková
A new perl 5.18 version brings a lot of changes done over a year of
development. See [1] for more details.
== Detailed description ==
New perl is released
24 matches
Mail list logo