On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 05:09:17PM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 09:56 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > Then the curious minds ask ... why clean_requirements_on_remove = 1
> > isn't a default?
>
> The main two main reasons we didn't just turn it on when written are:
>
> 1. New
Le Ven 22 juin 2012 15:22, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>
>
> Am 22.06.2012 15:17, schrieb Zdenek Pavlas:
>>> From: "Nicolas Mailhot"
>>> can we get a package downloader that sends the correct
>>> cache-control http headers to refresh data automatically
>>> instead of complaining metadata is wrong and
Am 22.06.2012 15:17, schrieb Zdenek Pavlas:
>> From: "Nicolas Mailhot"
>> can we get a package downloader that sends the correct
>> cache-control http headers to refresh data automatically
>> instead of complaining metadata is wrong and aborting
>> (for people behind a caching proxy)?
>
> Have
On 25/06/12 23:04, James Antill wrote:
yumdb unset reason '*'
Thanks ... results are interesting.
Matěj
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 10:10 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Jeu 21 juin 2012 14:23, Matej Cepl a écrit :
> > On 19/06/12 15:33, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> >> Thanks for pointing this out. I considered history a candidate for
> >> dropping because I didn't realize people had usecases for it. It is n
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 09:56 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 21/06/12 16:54, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> > On 06/21/2012 04:27 PM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
> >> Michal Schmidt writes:
> >>> We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1 in yum.conf
> >>
> >> in which version that is supported?
> >
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 10:02 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 21/06/12 16:54, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> > http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/orphaned-dep-cleanup-in-yum/
>
> Is there some post-processing tool which would should me all packages
> for which there is no reason? Brief look at the sour
> From: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> can we get a package downloader that sends the correct
> cache-control http headers to refresh data automatically
> instead of complaining metadata is wrong and aborting
> (for people behind a caching proxy)?
Have you tried changing http_caching option in yum.conf
fro
Michał Piotrowski writes:
> 2012/6/22 Matej Cepl :
>> On 21/06/12 16:54, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/21/2012 04:27 PM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
Michal Schmidt writes:
>
> We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1 in yum.conf
in which version th
2012/6/22 Matej Cepl :
> On 21/06/12 16:54, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> On 06/21/2012 04:27 PM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
>>>
>>> Michal Schmidt writes:
We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1 in yum.conf
>>>
>>>
>>> in which version that is supported?
>>
>>
>> Since 3.2.28-1
Le Jeu 21 juin 2012 14:23, Matej Cepl a écrit :
> On 19/06/12 15:33, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
>> Thanks for pointing this out. I considered history a candidate for
>> dropping because I didn't realize people had usecases for it. It is not
>> present in the early versions of DNF but I will make sure t
On 21/06/12 16:54, Michal Schmidt wrote:
http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/orphaned-dep-cleanup-in-yum/
Is there some post-processing tool which would should me all packages
for which there is no reason? Brief look at the source of
packages-cleanup shows that --orphans isn't the one.
On 21/06/12 16:54, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 06/21/2012 04:27 PM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
Michal Schmidt writes:
We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1 in yum.conf
in which version that is supported?
Since 3.2.28-13
http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/orphaned-dep-cleanup
On 21/06/12 16:07, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 06/21/2012 02:23 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
we don't have quality uninstall á la aptitude ("remove
this package and all packages which were installed just to satisfy its
requirements recursively")
We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1 in y
On 06/21/2012 04:27 PM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
Michal Schmidt writes:
We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1 in yum.conf
in which version that is supported?
Since 3.2.28-13
http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/orphaned-dep-cleanup-in-yum/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
Michal Schmidt writes:
> On 06/21/2012 02:23 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> we don't have quality uninstall á la aptitude ("remove
>> this package and all packages which were installed just to satisfy its
>> requirements recursively")
>
> We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1 in yum.con
On 06/21/2012 02:23 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
we don't have quality uninstall á la aptitude ("remove
this package and all packages which were installed just to satisfy its
requirements recursively")
We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1 in yum.conf
Michal
--
devel mailing list
deve
On 19/06/12 15:33, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. I considered history a candidate for
dropping because I didn't realize people had usecases for it. It is not
present in the early versions of DNF but I will make sure to put it back
in later.
Especially in the situation we h
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 08:28 +1000, Angus Salkeld wrote:
> On 19/06/12 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> >> On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/
2012/6/20 Nikola Pajkovsky :
> Angus Salkeld writes:
>
>> On 19/06/12 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org
Angus Salkeld writes:
> On 19/06/12 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
>>> On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
>>> >
>>> > Are the
On 06/19/2012 08:23 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Would it be helpful, if there was a list of extensively used options
so that DNF knew what high notes it needed to hit sooner rather than
later?
Absolutely, I created a wiki page for it:
https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/wiki/Features-backlog
On 19/06/12 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
>
> Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the futur
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Adam Miller wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
Are ther
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> > On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
> > >
> > > Are there any plans to
On 19 June 2012 11:51, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
>> On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
>> >
>> > Are there any plans to replace yum with
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
> >
> > Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future?
> >
> > According to what is written
On 06/19/2012 10:33 AM, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future?
According to what is written here
https://github.com/akozumpl/d
2012/6/19 Ales Kozumplik :
> On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
>>
>> Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future?
>>
>> According to what is written here
>> https://github.com/akozum
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future?
According to what is written here
https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/wiki/Features-Considered-for-Dropping
histor
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future?
I imagine (and this is pure speculation) that in some perfect future,
when dnf is considered mature, that it will probably be renamed to
yum. In other words, I think this fork o
On 19 June 2012 14:44, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> According to what is written here
> https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/wiki/Features-Considered-for-Dropping
> history function will likely be dropped.
>
> From my POV history feature is very useful. Is there a plan to provide
> history function in Fe
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future?
According to what is written here
https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/wiki/Features-Considered-for-Dropping
history function will likely be dropped.
From my POV his
33 matches
Mail list logo
