On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 21:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:08:56 +0300,
>> Kalev Lember wrote:
>>> With my proposal, Branched and rawhide would have exactly the same
>>> package set during the Alpha Freeze - Beta Freeze time frame. That way,
>>> we'd
Bruno Wolff III writes:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:08:56 +0300,
> Kalev Lember wrote:
>> With my proposal, Branched and rawhide would have exactly the same
>> package set during the Alpha Freeze - Beta Freeze time frame. That way,
>> we'd have a month to let users choose whether they want to
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:08:56 +0300,
Kalev Lember wrote:
> As it is right now, it is somewhat difficult to get off the rawhide
> track and to continue on Branched. For example, if a person that's
yum downgrade works pretty reasonably if you haven't moved too far past.
Broken deps cause issue
On 09/21/2011 12:47 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 22:38:32 +0300,
> Kalev Lember wrote:
>>
>> I would also like to move everybody who has been on the rawhide branch
>> to Branched at Alpha time, in order to get the maximum amount of testing
>> for the new release.
>
> May
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 22:38:32 +0300,
Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> I would also like to move everybody who has been on the rawhide branch
> to Branched at Alpha time, in order to get the maximum amount of testing
> for the new release.
Maybe most, but not everybody. Some people work on stuff in r
On 09/20/2011 09:18 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>>
>> My personal pet-peeve with the current branching policy is that
>> the mass-branching happens way way too early for packages where
>> there are no significant new development to be introduced
