Re: F13 Alpha - Zarafa

2010-03-10 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Kevin Kofler [11/03/2010 00:08] : > > OpenChange is an implementation of the M$ Exchange protocols, allowing Free > Software groupware clients to interoperate with M$ Exchange. It's a requirement for Zarafa which is basically a bridge between open protocols (IMAP, POP, Caldav, ...) and Exchange

Re: F13 Alpha - Zarafa

2010-03-10 Thread Matěj Cepl
Dne 10.3.2010 16:35, Tom "spot" Callaway napsal(a): > On 03/09/2010 05:23 PM, nodata wrote: >> Does Zimbra still ship as a blob of specific versions of lots of open >> source software, of which the specific versions cannot be changed? > > Also, the last time I looked, it had a bundled copy of the S

Re: F13 Alpha - Zarafa

2010-03-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Matthew Miller wrote: > although something called OpenChange was added for MS Exchange access in > Fedora 11. OpenChange != Open-Xchange In fact they're completely different: Open-Xchange is groupware software, to some extent a clone of M$ Exchange, but using open protocols. OpenChange is an impl

Re: F13 Alpha - Zarafa

2010-03-10 Thread Tom "spot" Callaway
On 03/09/2010 05:23 PM, nodata wrote: > Does Zimbra still ship as a blob of specific versions of lots of open > source software, of which the specific versions cannot be changed? Also, the last time I looked, it had a bundled copy of the Sun JDK (not the open sourced one either). ~spot -- devel

Re: F13 Alpha - Zarafa

2010-03-09 Thread nodata
On 09/03/10 23:07, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 03/10/2010 03:05 AM, Brian C. Huffman wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> I'm curious why Fedora chose to include Zarafa as opposed to other >>> (mostly) opensource groupware solutions? >>> >>> Ones that

Re: F13 Alpha - Zarafa

2010-03-09 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 03/10/2010 03:05 AM, Brian C. Huffman wrote: >> All, >> >> I'm curious why Fedora chose to include Zarafa as opposed to other >> (mostly) opensource groupware solutions? >> >> Ones that come to mind: Scalix, Open-Exchange, Zimbra. > > Som

Re: F13 Alpha - Zarafa

2010-03-09 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 04:35:50PM -0500, Brian C. Huffman wrote: > I'm curious why Fedora chose to include Zarafa as opposed to other (mostly) > opensource groupware solutions? > Ones that come to mind: Scalix, Open-Exchange, Zimbra. Because Someone Stepped Up And Did It. There's no big conspira

Re: F13 Alpha - Zarafa

2010-03-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 03:04 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 03/10/2010 03:05 AM, Brian C. Huffman wrote: > > All, > > > > I'm curious why Fedora chose to include Zarafa as opposed to other > > (mostly) opensource groupware solutions? > > > > Ones that come to mind: Scalix, Open-Exchange, Zimbra.

Re: F13 Alpha - Zarafa

2010-03-09 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 03/10/2010 03:05 AM, Brian C. Huffman wrote: > All, > > I'm curious why Fedora chose to include Zarafa as opposed to other > (mostly) opensource groupware solutions? > > Ones that come to mind: Scalix, Open-Exchange, Zimbra. Some contributors interested in Zarafa are now maintaining it in the F

F13 Alpha - Zarafa

2010-03-09 Thread Brian C. Huffman
All, I'm curious why Fedora chose to include Zarafa as opposed to other (mostly) opensource groupware solutions? Ones that come to mind: Scalix, Open-Exchange, Zimbra. Thanks, Brian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel