On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 02:03:03PM +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 15/11/10 13:54, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
>
> >
> > there are very good reasons to use anything but DOS-FAT. For example
> > F10 and F12 automount said filesystems with drastically different options
> > by default (filename downcasin
On 11/15/10 8:39 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> I assume that OS-X has not trouble with mounting various LinuxFS given
> that it is a *nix breed.
Being unix-ish doesn't really help, you need an actual filesystem driver
for the OS. There is an ext2/ext3 driver for osx (based on the bsd driv
On 11/15/2010 02:03 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 15/11/10 13:54, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
>
>> there are very good reasons to use anything but DOS-FAT. For example
>> F10 and F12 automount said filesystems with drastically different options
>> by default (filename downcasing), using any other FS av
On 15/11/10 13:54, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
>
> there are very good reasons to use anything but DOS-FAT. For example
> F10 and F12 automount said filesystems with drastically different options
> by default (filename downcasing), using any other FS avoids this trap
> and many other issues.
>
> Richa
