On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:02:23AM +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
> On 8 August 2013 10:44, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> > And the canonical RPM architecture name is what? "arm" or "armv7hl" or some
> > macro like %{ix86}?
>
>
> Yep. At the moment for my local builds I use "armv7hl" because the package
On 8 August 2013 10:44, Petr Pisar wrote:
> And the canonical RPM architecture name is what? "arm" or "armv7hl" or some
> macro like %{ix86}?
Yep. At the moment for my local builds I use "armv7hl" because the package
I build works only on armv7 with hfp; but would be good to know if there is
a
On 2013-08-07, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> With the recent addition of arm in our primary buildsystem, I am seeing
> some packages add ExcludeArch: arm or ExclusiveArch: %{ix86}
>
And the canonical RPM architecture name is what? "arm" or "armv7hl" or some
macro like %{ix86}?
-- Petr
--
devel mailing
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 22:33:17 +0100
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 02:36:48PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > If you exclude arm support for now, please file a bug against your
> > package with the information about the missing arm support and then
> > add "F-ExcludeArch-arm" to
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 02:36:48PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> If you exclude arm support for now, please file a bug against your
> package with the information about the missing arm support and then
> add "F-ExcludeArch-arm" to the Blocks field on your bug. This will make
> the arm team aware of
Greetings.
With the recent addition of arm in our primary buildsystem, I am seeing
some packages add ExcludeArch: arm or ExclusiveArch: %{ix86}
First, please DO NOT add ExclusiveArch on x86, unless your package
really and truly doesn't build on ANY of our secondary arches too.
(ppc64, s390).
I
