On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 10:32 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:36:11AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 08:29:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 16:01 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:18:36PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:43:39PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
> > > > The discussi
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:36:11AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 08:29:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. See
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 08:29:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> >
> >
> > There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. Seems
> > to be pretty common with virt and cloud stuff. Apart from that I can't
> > think of
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 08:59 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 08:29:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. Seems
> > > to be p
On Sun, 2014-11-30 at 13:43 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
> > The discussion I mentioned above was primarily about OpenStack (but the
> > participants also expressed concerns about sending 'environ' to Bugzilla
> > at all), where peo
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:18:36PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:43:39PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
> > > The discussion I mentioned above was primarily about OpenStack (but the
> > > par
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:43:39PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
> > The discussion I mentioned above was primarily about OpenStack (but the
> > participants also expressed concerns about sending 'environ' to Bugzilla
> > at all), wh
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 08:29:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> >
> >
> > There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. Seems
> > to be pretty common with virt and cloud stuff. Apart from that I can't
> > think of
Hi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
>
>
> There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. Seems
> to be pretty common with virt and cloud stuff. Apart from that I can't
> think of anything else right now.
Rackspace, DigitalOcean, Google Computing Engine etc
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:43:39PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> How about having abrt just remove or scrub all variables that start
> with /^OS_/ ? I know it's nasty to have application-specific
> treatment of environment variables like this, but the number of
> applications that pass auth i
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
> The discussion I mentioned above was primarily about OpenStack (but the
> participants also expressed concerns about sending 'environ' to Bugzilla
> at all), where people are regularly storing their passwords and tokens
> as environment
On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 00:28 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:02:00PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:23:57 +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
> > > Do you find 'environ' attachment valuable or is ABRT just publishing
> > > personal
> > > informa
On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 19:02 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:23:57 +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
> > Do you find 'environ' attachment valuable or is ABRT just publishing
> > personal
> > information?
>
> No but I can imagine in some cases it may be useful.
>
> Couldn't there be
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:02:00PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:23:57 +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
> > Do you find 'environ' attachment valuable or is ABRT just publishing
> > personal
> > information?
>
> No but I can imagine in some cases it may be useful.
Is this a proble
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:23:57 +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
> Do you find 'environ' attachment valuable or is ABRT just publishing personal
> information?
No but I can imagine in some cases it may be useful.
Couldn't there be a way to send additional information upon bug assignee's
request? That woul
Hello,
As you might know ABRT attaches 'environ' file to its Bugzilla bugs. The file
contains a full copy of /proc/[pid]/environ. Even though ABRT highlights
black-listed words and encourages users to review the data before submitting
them, it may happen that the reporter misses something and publ
17 matches
Mail list logo
