On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:10:31 -0600
Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I would've expected anything that exists in epel6 and doesn't exist
> > in rhel7 to get an epel7 branch. It seems a bit ludicrous doing it
> > manually
It's not. There's a bunch of things that are in epel6 that are
pointless to have in e
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:10 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 07:38 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Richard Shaw
> wrote:
>
>> > > I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of my packages
>> > > that
>> > > have el6 branches, but not all of them. I didn't request them (yet) so
>> > > I'm
>> > > wondering, are some packages automatically added or did someone else
>> > > request
>> > > them as a dependency t
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 07:38 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Richard Shaw
> wrote:
> > > I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of my packages
> that
> > > have el6 branches
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 07:38 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of my packages that
> > have el6 branches, but not all of them. I didn't request them (yet) so I'm
> > wondering,
Hi Richard,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of my packages that
> have el6 branches, but not all of them. I didn't request them (yet) so I'm
> wondering, are some packages automatically added or did someone else reques
I saw the announcement a week or so ago but it didn't appear to answer my
questions...
I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of my packages that
have el6 branches, but not all of them. I didn't request them (yet) so I'm
wondering, are some packages automatically added or did some
