Re: Dual licenses question

2022-10-17 Thread Sandro
On 17-10-2022 12:19, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: Would that imply I have to add the LGPL license text to the package myself? The packaging guidelines state that the desired course of action is to contact upstream and ask them to provide the licence text. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/pa

Re: Dual licenses question

2022-10-17 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:10:26PM +0200, Sandro wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently updating brewtarget [0] which I recently adopted. > > For a handful of PNG files upstream has the following in their COPYRIGHT > file: License: CC-BY-SA-3.0 or LGPL-3.0 [1]. > > The text of the CC license is in the f

Re: Dual licenses question

2022-10-17 Thread Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> Would that imply I have to add the LGPL license text to the package myself? The packaging guidelines state that the desired course of action is to contact upstream and ask them to provide the licence text. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_tex

Dual licenses question

2022-10-17 Thread Sandro
Hi, I'm currently updating brewtarget [0] which I recently adopted. For a handful of PNG files upstream has the following in their COPYRIGHT file: License: CC-BY-SA-3.0 or LGPL-3.0 [1]. The text of the CC license is in the file, however the text of the LGPL license is not, nor is it shipped