On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 05:00:16PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > BTW. Can Obsoletes ever be removed? We have an Obsoletes: libelf <=
> > 0.8.2-2 on elfutils-libelf since the original cvsdist import of 2004
> > because there used to be a different libelf implementation (with a dead
> > upstream
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 4:56 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 09:59 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:25 AM Mark Wielaard
> > > I committed the removal of the two static subpackages and added an
> > > Obsoletes: elfutils-devel-static%{depsuffix}
* Mark Wielaard:
> BTW. Can Obsoletes ever be removed? We have an Obsoletes: libelf <=
> 0.8.2-2 on elfutils-libelf since the original cvsdist import of 2004
> because there used to be a different libelf implementation (with a dead
> upstream these days). Can I remove that? Or is it better to keep
Hi,
On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 09:59 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:25 AM Mark Wielaard
> > I committed the removal of the two static subpackages and added an
> > Obsoletes: elfutils-devel-static%{depsuffix} < 0.180-5 to elfutils-
> > devel and an Obsoletes: elfutils-libelf-
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:25 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 15:21 -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
> > On 7/21/20 3:12 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > > > Is there a procedure to follow for dropping these sub-packages, or can
> > > > > I simply remove them from the spec file?
> >
Hi,
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 15:21 -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 7/21/20 3:12 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > > Is there a procedure to follow for dropping these sub-packages, or can
> > > > I simply remove them from the spec file?
> > >
> > > Maybe add Obsoletes to the devel subpackages, but not Pro
On 7/21/20 3:12 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>>> Is there a procedure to follow for dropping these sub-packages, or can
>>> I simply remove them from the spec file?
>>
>> Maybe add Obsoletes to the devel subpackages, but not Provides.
>>
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#ren
Hi Josh,
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 14:47 -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 7/21/20 2:24 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Nothing seems to require these packages, but that might be simply be
> > because they are static libraries, so there aren't any runtime
> > requirements. Is there some way to determine if a
On 7/21/20 2:24 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Nothing seems to require these packages, but that might be simply be
> because they are static libraries, so there aren't any runtime
> requirements. Is there some way to determine if anything would start
> failing to build if I simply remove them? Apart f
Hi,
I would like to drop the elfutils-libelf-devel-static and elfutils-
devel-static subpackages which provide static libraries for libelf and
libdw/libasm. They seem to have been provided a long time ago for some
core binaries, like rpm, to provide static binaries. But it looks like
nothing is us
10 matches
Mail list logo
