Re: Drop of the "libjpeg-turbo jpeg8 ABI" feature

2013-01-21 Thread Kevin Kofler
Vít Ondruch wrote: > Shouldn't be the feature page just deleted? Or archived in some better > category such as "deferred"? There is 256 (nice number ;) incomplete > feature pages, some of them are probably abandoned as this one. Would be > nice to do some cleanup there, to see what is actively work

Feature page cleanup (Was: Re: Drop of the "libjpeg-turbo jpeg8 ABI" feature)

2013-01-18 Thread Pekka Pietikäinen
On 1/17/13 2:16 PM, Adam Tkac wrote: Ok, I'm going to switch libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI to incomplete category, thanks. Shouldn't be the feature page just deleted? Or archived in some better category such as "deferred"? There is 256 (nice number ;) incomplete feature pages, some of them are probabl

Re: Drop of the "libjpeg-turbo jpeg8 ABI" feature

2013-01-17 Thread Adam Tkac
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:37:56PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 16.1.2013 17:42, Jaroslav Reznik napsal(a): > >- Original Message - > >>Hello all, > >> > >>after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided > >>to drop the > >>"jpeg8 API/ABI" feature and include only jpe

Re: Drop of the "libjpeg-turbo jpeg8 ABI" feature

2013-01-17 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 16.1.2013 17:42, Jaroslav Reznik napsal(a): - Original Message - Hello all, after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided to drop the "jpeg8 API/ABI" feature and include only jpeg6 API/ABI. Ok, I'm going to switch libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI to incomplete category

Re: Drop of the "libjpeg-turbo jpeg8 ABI" feature

2013-01-16 Thread Adam Tkac
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:38:29AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:14:26 +0100 > Adam Tkac wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided > > to drop the "jpeg8 API/ABI" feature and include only jpeg6 API/ABI. > > The main r

Re: Drop of the "libjpeg-turbo jpeg8 ABI" feature

2013-01-16 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - > Hello all, > > after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided > to drop the > "jpeg8 API/ABI" feature and include only jpeg6 API/ABI. Ok, I'm going to switch libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI to incomplete category, thanks. Jaroslav > The main > reason

Re: Drop of the "libjpeg-turbo jpeg8 ABI" feature

2013-01-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:14:26 +0100 Adam Tkac wrote: > Hello all, > > after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided > to drop the "jpeg8 API/ABI" feature and include only jpeg6 API/ABI. > The main reason is that libjpeg upstream didn't present any valid > argument for post-j

Drop of the "libjpeg-turbo jpeg8 ABI" feature

2013-01-16 Thread Adam Tkac
Hello all, after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided to drop the "jpeg8 API/ABI" feature and include only jpeg6 API/ABI. The main reason is that libjpeg upstream didn't present any valid argument for post-jpeg6 changes and libjpeg-turbo is not going to port all post-jpeg6