On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 15:22 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Josh Boyer
>>> > wrot
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 15:22 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Josh Boyer
>> > wrote:
>> >> The other positions will be filled by general election
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 15:22 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Josh Boyer
> > wrote:
> >> The other positions will be filled by general election
> >> every two years. As a special exception, four seats wi
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> In your opinion, should we have term limits imposed to ensure we have
> fresh members coming into the WG? As I said in another email, I think
> we should shoot for some continuity while also encouraging new members
> to step up.
Not sure.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> The other positions will be filled by general election
>> every two years. As a special exception, four seats will be filled in
>> one year, with those positions chosen at random (un
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> The other positions will be filled by general election
> every two years. As a special exception, four seats will be filled in
> one year, with those positions chosen at random (unless some number of
> members decide to step down). Voting w
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Giving the FESCO rep a two year term seems to be a potential problem as they
> wouldn't be guaranteed to be in FESCO for two years and most of the time
> you'd probably want the rep to be a member of FESCO. Maybe the FESCO rep
> should just
Giving the FESCO rep a two year term seems to be a potential problem as
they wouldn't be guaranteed to be in FESCO for two years and most of
the time you'd probably want the rep to be a member of FESCO. Maybe the
FESCO rep should just serve at the pleasure of FESCO?
--
devel mailing list
devel@
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:01:52AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> The Fedora Workstation Work Group has nine voting members, with one
>> member selected by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee as the
>> liaison to FESCo.
>
> Is the FES
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:01:52AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> The Fedora Workstation Work Group has nine voting members, with one
> member selected by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee as the
> liaison to FESCo.
Is the FESCo appointed member one of the nine voting members?
--
Matthew Ga
Hi All,
Below is a draft governance charter for the Workstation WG. I have
taken much of this from the Cloud WG draft charter (found here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud_WG) to have some commonality
between groups. I left some of the sections from that off for now, as
I think that is their
11 matches
Mail list logo
