On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 09:04:23 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I've highlighted the %{?dist} tag issue. see if this is better now:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages
>
Any change like that could help. :) Thanks for the effort!
--
devel ma
Dne 28.8.2013 16:27, Miloslav Trmač napsal(a):
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Thanks for your interest. It is a reoccuring problem that both the rename
request submitter *and* the reviewer get the Obsoletes tags wrong.
Perhaps the guidelines should be more clear, then
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:27:44PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Thanks for your interest. It is a reoccuring problem that both the rename
> > request submitter *and* the reviewer get the Obsoletes tags wrong.
>
> Perhaps the guideline
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Thanks for your interest. It is a reoccuring problem that both the rename
> request submitter *and* the reviewer get the Obsoletes tags wrong.
Perhaps the guidelines should be more clear, then. (No, I don't have
a specific proposal.)
Dear Fedora Packagers,
when renaming a package, _please_ verify that the Obsoletes tag you add to
a package specifies a high enough version.
Make sure the new package really replaces the last published build of the
old package. Pay extra attention to our dist tag. It is part of the
Release value
