On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > Just as a general note on this thread: if you're a packager and you
> > have a genuine reason why people should be careful about touching your
> > package, or follow some
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Just as a general note on this thread: if you're a packager and you
> have a genuine reason why people should be careful about touching your
> package, or follow some specific process when doing so, or there's
> something that people might
ubject: Re: Dealing with the "my packages" problem
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:24:37PM -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:08:24PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
After some IRC discussion I've come to the following
proposal: that
maintainer
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 07:19:13AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> But this could still be a great feature, provided we extend the service
> to non-provenpackagers. If any old Joe could offer submit requests to
> packages, as is already the case in openSUSE, that would be huge in
> terms of build
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 11/18/2015 02:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> Just as a general note on this thread: if you're a packager and you
>> have a genuine reason why people should be careful about touching your
>> package, or follow some specific process w
On 11/18/2015 02:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Just as a general note on this thread: if you're a packager and you
have a genuine reason why people should be careful about touching your
package, or follow some specific process when doing so, or there's
something that people might think they shoul
On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:06 +0100, Martin Kolman wrote:
> We could have a mechanism that stages the change and notifies the
> maintainer (eq. asks first automatically) and gives him the option to
> apply the change or cancel it & do it properly themselves.
At this point we are overengineering. It'
November, 2015 7:05:57 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Dealing with the "my packages" problem
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:24:37PM -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> > > > Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:0
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:23:09 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> I also wonder if I revert a provenpackager change, is that the end of
> it? Who is the arbiter in this case if not?
It would be necessary to understand why there's disagreement about how
to package something. Has there been contact betwe
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 16:39 -0500, David Airlie wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Brian C. Lane"
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Thursday, 19 November, 2015 7:05:57 AM
> > Subject: Re: Dealing with the "my packages&qu
> "BCL" == Brian C Lane writes:
BCL> I don't think we need a technical solution, we just need the people
BCL> who feel the need to modify packages they aren't normally involved
BCL> with to ask first. It doesn't matter how simple or complicated the
BCL> change is, just be polite.
I disagree.
David Airlie wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Brian C. Lane"
>> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Sent: Thursday, 19 November, 2015 7:05:57 AM
>> Subject: Re: Dealing with the "my packages" problem
>>
>&g
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 10:04 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:08:24PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > After some IRC discussion I've come to the following proposal: that
> > maintainers have some way to easily indicate how open they are to
> > external contributions.
- Original Message -
> From: "Brian C. Lane"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, 19 November, 2015 7:05:57 AM
> Subject: Re: Dealing with the "my packages" problem
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:24:37PM -0500, Rob Crittenden wro
On Nov 18, 2015 14:06, "Brian C. Lane" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:24:37PM -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> > Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:08:24PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > >> After some IRC discussion I've come to the following proposal: that
> > >>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:24:37PM -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:08:24PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >> After some IRC discussion I've come to the following proposal: that
> >> maintainers have some way to easily indicate how open they
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:08:24PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> After some IRC discussion I've come to the following proposal: that
>> maintainers have some way to easily indicate how open they are to
>> external contributions. Basically this would take the form of
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:08:24PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> After some IRC discussion I've come to the following proposal: that
> maintainers have some way to easily indicate how open they are to
> external contributions. Basically this would take the form of a few
> options in pkgdb w
2015-11-18 1:08 GMT+01:00 Jason L Tibbitts III :
> tl; dr: I have submitted the following RFE for pkgdb:
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2/issues/274
> Please add comments there if you have any.
>
> I know I'm not the only provenpackager to have applied a bugfix to
> someone's package only
On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 19:21 -0500, David Airlie wrote:
> >
> Maybe by renaming package maintainers to something like caretakers we could
> start changing the way people who maintain packages view their positions.
We actually already did that, but people haven't taken much notice. If
you look in p
> "DA" == David Airlie writes:
DA> This seems like a crappy technical solution to a social problem.
I don't know; it seems to be more discoverable than the current state,
where either you just commit and hope. And yeah, I'm relatively thick
skinned but I still don't like to get flamed by a
>
> tl; dr: I have submitted the following RFE for pkgdb:
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2/issues/274
> Please add comments there if you have any.
>
> I know I'm not the only provenpackager to have applied a bugfix to
> someone's package only to be yelled at it for it. Some maintainers
tl; dr: I have submitted the following RFE for pkgdb:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2/issues/274
Please add comments there if you have any.
I know I'm not the only provenpackager to have applied a bugfix to
someone's package only to be yelled at it for it. Some maintainers are
more prick
23 matches
Mail list logo
