On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> This argument falls over by the fact that the fedora builders are all rhel 6
> except for the arm ones that are running fedora 18. it is true you can not
> use rhel 5
That is precisely the kind of situation I encountered in the past..
I'm a
This argument falls over by the fact that the fedora builders are all rhel 6
except for the arm ones that are running fedora 18. it is true you can not use
rhel 5
Corey Quinn wrote:
>On Jun 14, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> Ah, I see.
>>
>> IMHO, you should use mock anytime y
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:34:12 -0700
Corey Quinn wrote:
> …except for the bit where this breaks in many cases if you're running
> mock on EL6 and trying to build for Fedora-recent, which was Nico's
> point.
Many cases ?
Note that all our builders are RHEL6, building packages for Fedora in
mock.
On Jun 14, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Ah, I see.
>
> IMHO, you should use mock anytime you build any packages, and if you do
> that, the platform you run mock on largely doesn't matter (with a few
> rare corner cases).
>
…except for the bit where this breaks in many cases if y
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:14:25 -0700
Corey Quinn wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:50:05 -0400
> > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> >> It's exceptionally difficult and unreliable for RHEL or CentOS to
> >> build packages for current or recent
On Jun 14, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:50:05 -0400
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> It's exceptionally difficult and unreliable for RHEL or CentOS to
>> build packages for current or recent releases with "mock" or other
>> chroot cage tool kits. Too many non-ba
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:50:05 -0400
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> It's exceptionally difficult and unreliable for RHEL or CentOS to
> build packages for current or recent releases with "mock" or other
> chroot cage tool kits. Too many non-backwards compatible changes in
> RPM and yum.
Hum? rpm and y
It's exceptionally difficult and unreliable for RHEL or CentOS to build
packages for current or recent releases with "mock" or other chroot cage tool
kits. Too many non-backwards compatible changes in RPM and yum.
I use mock and a recent Fedora to build packages for RHEL, especially to test
EPE
13.06.2013 19:03, Peter Robinson:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
I want to create subj (VM server - minimal CentOS 6 x64 + libvirtd) but
don't know - how to do this.
Without locally installed CentOS.
Anakonda? Koji?
Completely the wrong mailing list to discuss this... ce
You should take a look at the oVirt project and the oVirt node build process
On Jun 13, 2013 9:56 AM, "Eugene Pivnev" wrote:
> I want to create subj (VM server - minimal CentOS 6 x64 + libvirtd) but
> don't know - how to do this.
> Without locally installed CentOS.
> Anakonda? Koji?
> --
> devel
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> I want to create subj (VM server - minimal CentOS 6 x64 + libvirtd) but
> don't know - how to do this.
> Without locally installed CentOS.
> Anakonda? Koji?
Completely the wrong mailing list to discuss this... centos has their
own lists... I
I want to create subj (VM server - minimal CentOS 6 x64 + libvirtd) but
don't know - how to do this.
Without locally installed CentOS.
Anakonda? Koji?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
12 matches
Mail list logo
