On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
> However, since git allows you to create local branches at will without
> any restrictions, one has to ask if it is still necessary to have a
> remote branch for your work.
I did end up creating a branch in the Fedora system because it was the
only way
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/4/10 3:01 PM, M A Young wrote:
> What is the policy on creating private branches under fedpkg/git? Can it
> be done by anyone with acl commit or do you need special permissions?
>
> My interest is that I had a private branch o
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:01:45PM +0100, M A Young wrote:
> What is the policy on creating private branches under fedpkg/git? Can it
> be done by anyone with acl commit or do you need special permissions?
>
> My interest is that I had a private branch of the kernel package under CV
I believe the manifest ACL behavior is that you are permitted to push to a
branch called fN/anything if you are on the pkgdb ACL for fN, and to
anything not matching fN/* if you are on the pkgdb ACL for devel/rawhide.
So the practical answer is probably that whatever the maintainers for a
particula
What is the policy on creating private branches under fedpkg/git? Can it
be done by anyone with acl commit or do you need special permissions?
My interest is that I had a private branch of the kernel package under CVS
which I used to build pvops enabled kernels so that the more adventurous
