Re: Could someone, please, clarify situation with *-javadoc

2010-05-08 Thread Alexander Boström
lör 2010-05-08 klockan 00:56 +0200 skrev Guido Grazioli: > Someone would disagree with me; however i think any decision is taken on > that topic would be turned in a MUST (depend or not depend) for the sake > of coherency. I can only think of rather far-fetched situations where such a dependency

Re: Could someone, please, clarify situation with *-javadoc

2010-05-07 Thread Guido Grazioli
2010/5/7 Alexander Boström : > fre 2010-05-07 klockan 13:41 -0400 skrev Andrew Overholt: >>> Sometimes *-javadoc sub-packages explicitly requires main package, and >>> sometimes - not. I'm not a java-expert, so I don't know which is >>> correct. >> >> I don't think it really matters.  In some cases

Re: Could someone, please, clarify situation with *-javadoc

2010-05-07 Thread Alexander Boström
(changing lists) fre 2010-05-07 klockan 13:41 -0400 skrev Andrew Overholt: > Hi, > > > Sometimes *-javadoc sub-packages explicitly requires main package, and > > sometimes - not. I'm not a java-expert, so I don't know which is > > correct. > > I don't think it really matters. In some cases, sur

Re: Could someone, please, clarify situation with *-javadoc

2010-05-07 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:41 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > Sometimes *-javadoc sub-packages explicitly requires main package, and > > sometimes - not. I'm not a java-expert, so I don't know which is > > correct. > > I don't think it really matters. In some cases, sure, it would be nice > to en

Re: Could someone, please, clarify situation with *-javadoc

2010-05-07 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Friday 07 May 2010, Andrew Overholt wrote: > Hi, > > > Sometimes *-javadoc sub-packages explicitly requires main package, and > > sometimes - not. I'm not a java-expert, so I don't know which is > > correct. > > I don't think it really matters. In some cases, sure, it would be nice > to ensur

Re: Could someone, please, clarify situation with *-javadoc

2010-05-07 Thread Andrew Overholt
Hi, > Sometimes *-javadoc sub-packages explicitly requires main package, and > sometimes - not. I'm not a java-expert, so I don't know which is > correct. I don't think it really matters. In some cases, sure, it would be nice to ensure that the package is around if someone is looking at the API

Re: Could someone, please, clarify situation with *-javadoc

2010-05-07 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "PL" == Peter Lemenkov writes: PL> Sometimes *-javadoc sub-packages explicitly requires main PL> package, and sometimes - not. I'm not a java-expert, so I don't know PL> which is correct. Java guidelines have come up recently on the packaging list. The templates in the Java packaging guid

Could someone, please, clarify situation with *-javadoc

2010-05-07 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All! Sometimes *-javadoc sub-packages explicitly requires main package, and sometimes - not. I'm not a java-expert, so I don't know which is correct. Could someone, please, clarify this? -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://adm