Re: Confusing SCM package request

2017-09-06 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 13:14 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> Taking your follow up of "folks doing the SCM requests" into account, >> I don't think that's what they signed up for? That's the job of a >> sponsor. >> >> However, you're just making

Re: Confusing SCM package request

2017-09-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 13:14 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > Taking your follow up of "folks doing the SCM requests" into account, > I don't think that's what they signed up for? That's the job of a > sponsor. > > However, you're just making cases for the easy to catch things and > didn't address my po

Re: Confusing SCM package request

2017-09-06 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 12:26 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> What you're catching by doing this forced delay is >> rushed reviews or laziness on the part of two people. > > Also *ignorance*, in the case of legally-not-allowed things. And it We

Re: Confusing SCM package request

2017-09-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 09:53 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 12:26 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > What you're catching by doing this forced delay is > > rushed reviews or laziness on the part of two people. > > Also *ignorance*, in the case of legally-not-allowed things. And it

Re: Confusing SCM package request

2017-09-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 12:26 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > What you're catching by doing this forced delay is > rushed reviews or laziness on the part of two people. Also *ignorance*, in the case of legally-not-allowed things. And it also allows the folks doing the package reviews to look for patterns

Re: Confusing SCM package request

2017-09-06 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 09/02/2017 07:09 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:48:47AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser >>> wrote: Am 29.08.2017 um 11:30 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: >>>

Re: Confusing SCM package request

2017-09-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 09/02/2017 07:09 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:48:47AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser >> wrote: >>> Am 29.08.2017 um 11:30 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: I'm trying to import this package into Fedora:

Re: Confusing SCM package request

2017-09-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:48:47AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser > wrote: > > Am 29.08.2017 um 11:30 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > >> > >> I'm trying to import this package into Fedora: > >> > >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11

Re: Confusing SCM package request

2017-08-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am 29.08.2017 um 11:30 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: >> >> I'm trying to import this package into Fedora: >> >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174036 >> >> I went through the new process as far as I can tell and the to

Re: Confusing SCM package request

2017-08-29 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am 29.08.2017 um 11:30 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: I'm trying to import this package into Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174036 I went through the new process as far as I can tell and the tool just filed a bug and printed out the URL of the bug: $ fedrepo-req -t 117

Confusing SCM package request

2017-08-29 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I'm trying to import this package into Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174036 I went through the new process as far as I can tell and the tool just filed a bug and printed out the URL of the bug: $ fedrepo-req -t 1174036 ocaml-re https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-re