On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 13:44 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/16/2010 01:37 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> > Dne 16.3.2010 13:04, Jon Masters napsal(a):
> >> I'd just add those gstreamer packages to my exclude config in yum for
> >> the moment, if you don't want to deal with the breakage each time. The
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:32:19 +0530, Ankur wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 21:46 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:46:16 -0400, James wrote:
> >
> > > Rpmfusion can run auto QA like tests on rpmfusion and Fedora (I don't
> > > think we can legally do the same ... but I'm no
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 21:46 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:46:16 -0400, James wrote:
>
> > Rpmfusion can run auto QA like tests on rpmfusion and Fedora (I don't
> > think we can legally do the same ... but I'm not sure). Finding the file
> > conflicts automatically is har
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:46:16 -0400, James wrote:
> Rpmfusion can run auto QA like tests on rpmfusion and Fedora (I don't
> think we can legally do the same ... but I'm not sure). Finding the file
> conflicts automatically is harder (you need to download all the rpms),
> and it's not fast, but it'
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 15:46 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> but it's possible (Seth has a script, IIRC).
I do believe seth's script works purely from metadata without
downloading the rpms.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
Descrip
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 15:46 -0400, James Antill wrote:
>> but it's possible (Seth has a script, IIRC).
>
> I do believe seth's script works purely from metadata without
> downloading the rpms.
it gets the headers from the pkgs w/o downloading the whol
On 16.03.2010 20:46, James Antill wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 20:09 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 16.03.2010 17:42, Till Maas wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:45:33PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
There are so many developers around on this list that know: reporting
bugs
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, James Antill wrote:
>
> Rpmfusion can run auto QA like tests on rpmfusion and Fedora (I don't
> think we can legally do the same ... but I'm not sure). Finding the file
> conflicts automatically is harder (you need to download all the rpms),
> and it's not fast, but it's pos
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 20:09 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 16.03.2010 17:42, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:45:33PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >> There are so many developers around on this list that know: reporting
> >> bugs is the right way to get problems fixed and
On 16.03.2010 17:42, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:45:33PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> There are so many developers around on this list that know: reporting
>> bugs is the right way to get problems fixed and fixing things is way
>> better than posting workarounds to public pl
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:45:33PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> There are so many developers around on this list that know: reporting
> bugs is the right way to get problems fixed and fixing things is way
> better than posting workarounds to public places for various reasons --
> nevertheless
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/16/2010 03:34 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Except that that's not the case here, as Benjamin and I have been in
> contact with Hans who takes care of the RPMFusion packages from the
> start.
Thanks for the insight, didn't know this has changed in
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 13:45 +0100, Alexander Kahl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thorsten Leemhuis from RPMFusion said why this is the case at the FUDCon
> 09 in Berlin and it will continue to be the case if nothing changes: No
> collaboration and total underappreciat
Ankur Sinha wrote on 16.03.2010 14:33:
> On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 13:45 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Jon Masters wrote on 16.03.2010 13:04:
>> > On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 11:16 +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:
>> >> Dne 16.3.2010 09:50, Ankur Sinha napsal(a):
>> >> > I did notice that. I wasn't sure why a p
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 13:45 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Jon Masters wrote on 16.03.2010 13:04:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 11:16 +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> >> Dne 16.3.2010 09:50, Ankur Sinha napsal(a):
> >> > I did notice that. I wasn't sure why a package from rpmfusion would
> >> > conflict w
Jon Masters wrote on 16.03.2010 13:04:
> On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 11:16 +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:
>> Dne 16.3.2010 09:50, Ankur Sinha napsal(a):
>> > I did notice that. I wasn't sure why a package from rpmfusion would
>> > conflict with one from fedora repos. (It's in rpmfusion for a reason)
>> > Is it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thorsten Leemhuis from RPMFusion said why this is the case at the FUDCon
09 in Berlin and it will continue to be the case if nothing changes: No
collaboration and total underappreciation of RPMFusion's work. We cannot
legally endorse RPMFusion but we c
On 03/16/2010 01:37 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 16.3.2010 13:04, Jon Masters napsal(a):
>> I'd just add those gstreamer packages to my exclude config in yum for
>> the moment, if you don't want to deal with the breakage each time. Then
>> you can remove those excludes when the repos catch up with e
Dne 16.3.2010 13:04, Jon Masters napsal(a):
> I'd just add those gstreamer packages to my exclude config in yum for
> the moment, if you don't want to deal with the breakage each time. Then
> you can remove those excludes when the repos catch up with each other.
>
> /etc/yum.conf:
>
> exclude=gstre
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 11:16 +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 16.3.2010 09:50, Ankur Sinha napsal(a):
> > I did notice that. I wasn't sure why a package from rpmfusion would
> > conflict with one from fedora repos. (It's in rpmfusion for a reason)
> > Is it being obsoleted by a fedora package (license
Dne 16.3.2010 09:50, Ankur Sinha napsal(a):
> I did notice that. I wasn't sure why a package from rpmfusion would
> conflict with one from fedora repos. (It's in rpmfusion for a reason)
> Is it being obsoleted by a fedora package (license been cleared or
> something)?
There are constantly modules
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 08:51 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:19:56PM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> > Trying a "yum update" gives me this. Broken update?
> >
> >
> > Transaction Check Error:
> > file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstshapewipe.so from install of
> > gstreamer-
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:19:56PM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Trying a "yum update" gives me this. Broken update?
>
>
> Transaction Check Error:
> file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstshapewipe.so from install of
> gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.21-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from
> packag
hey,
Trying a "yum update" gives me this. Broken update?
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstshapewipe.so from install of
gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.21-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.x86_64
file /usr/bin/gst-came
24 matches
Mail list logo
