On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 11:40:52PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> As the guilty party in many cases for not updating the .rng file...
>
> Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) said:
> > > The comps-el4.xml.in and comps-el5.xml.in changes remove a nearly
> > > empty named "editors". The description cla
As the guilty party in many cases for not updating the .rng file...
Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) said:
> > The comps-el4.xml.in and comps-el5.xml.in changes remove a nearly
> > empty named "editors". The description claims that the group
> > contains emacs and vi, but it doesn't. All it conta
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 12:08:23 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
> I'm surprised that there have been no replies to this. Currently,
> people who edit the comps files can't tell if they broke something,
> because the current batch of files already fails to validate. I'm
Yeah, this started happening a whi
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Jerry James wrote:
>> There is a reference to a "clustering" group inside the "servers"
>> category in comps-f21.xml.in, but no definition of "clustering"
>> anywhere that I can see. Also:
>>
>> [comps]$ make v
