Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Björn Persson wrote:
> > As an example, Kmail and Kate recently started making noises in certain
> > situations, when displaying dialog boxes and the like, even though I had
> > sound effects turned off.
>
> In that case, they were always supposed to make those event sounds,
On Monday, January 24, 2011 02:06:50 am Kevin Kofler wrote:
> You can run "systemsettings" from a terminal or a "run command" interface.
>
> (I think we should reconsider the decision of having KDE's System Settings
> only shown in the menu in KDE/Plasma sessions, I'll bring this up in our
> KDE
Adam Williamson wrote:
> and I would need an exception to the 'no-non-upstreamed-patches' policy to
> ship those patches.
That's not a policy, it's a purely indicative guideline which states very
clearly that there are many reasons why patches can be needed. It's purely
the maintainer/comaintain
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 06:47 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Configuration from 0.8 does not migrate to 0.9. You'll have to re-do
> > your configuration. This isn't a consequence of the gconf stuff
> > mentioned above, it's just an upstream change: for all config storage
> >
Björn Persson wrote:
> I agree with that, and it's still annoying even if it's not literally
> everything that must be reconfigured.
Right, but:
> As an example, Kmail and Kate recently started making noises in certain
> situations, when displaying dialog boxes and the like, even though I had
> s
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> It's really rude to force
> users to reconfigure everything when they upgrade to a new Fedora just
> because upstream couldn't be bothered to migrate settings properly (and I
> hate upstreams doing that).
I agree with that, and it's still annoying even if it's not literall
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Configuration from 0.8 does not migrate to 0.9. You'll have to re-do
> your configuration. This isn't a consequence of the gconf stuff
> mentioned above, it's just an upstream change: for all config storage
> backends, there was a clean break from 0.8 to 0.9 and configurati
drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
>> In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson
>> wrote:
>>> * desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install
>>> 'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' choice at
>>> the login ma
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>> * desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install
>> 'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' choice at
>> the login manager you can use to ge
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 16:02 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> Just upgraded to the latest and greatest. Most of compiz seems to work
> properly. However, ccsm-0.9.2.1-1 now crashes when I try to
> set command key bindings. Reverting to ccsm-0.8.4-5 did not solve the
> problem.
hum, interesting -
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 00:13 +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > * desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install
> > 'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' choice at
> > the login manager you can use t
In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson wrote:
> * desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install
> 'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' choice at
> the login manager you can use to get a GNOME 2 + Compiz-style desktop
> (with panel, not Shell)
Just upgraded to the latest and greatest. Most of compiz seems to work
properly. However, ccsm-0.9.2.1-1 now crashes when I try to
set command key bindings. Reverting to ccsm-0.8.4-5 did not solve the
problem.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 04:47 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> Compiz works, but emerald refuses to decorate my windows
> emerald-0.8.4-7.fc15.x86_64.rpm
That's the old, un-fixed emerald build - it must not have made it into
the last compose. The fixed build is
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/b
Compiz works, but emerald refuses to decorate my windows
ccsm-0.9.2.1-1.fc15.noarch.rpm
compiz-0.9.2.2-0.8.git619abc05b1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
compizconfig-python-0.9.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
compiz-plugins-main-0.9.2.1-4.fc15.x86_64.rpm
fusion-icon-0.1.0-0.9.5e2dc9git.fc15.noarch.rpm
fusion-icon-gtk-0.1.
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:03 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> for now I'm going to at least see if I can get a 'pure-gconf' setup to
> work with ccsm.
well, I think I have this going now. the question now is whether to
force gconf on all compiz users...I think I'll update the bug report
with the is
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:03 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> configure compiz!' was one of the most popular bug reports (see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532229 ). I can't really
> think of a really good way to set this up, especially given that the
> compiz user base seems split f
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 11:03 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:20 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > So all the gconf schemas are now in -gconf subpackages which you don't
> > have to install unless you really, really want to use the gconf
> > configuration storage system for so
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:20 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So all the gconf schemas are now in -gconf subpackages which you don't
> have to install unless you really, really want to use the gconf
> configuration storage system for some reason. If you do, you'll have
> to
> make sure whatever metho
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 17:49 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> I have to agree with there being too many way to launch compiz. I've
> decided I like having the fusion-icon applet in the panel, so I'll wait
> to see what you've been able to do with fusion-icon. Compiz-gtk wants to
> pull in 13 new pa
I have to agree with there being too many way to launch compiz. I've
decided I like having the fusion-icon applet in the panel, so I'll wait
to see what you've been able to do with fusion-icon. Compiz-gtk wants to
pull in 13 new packages - that's 13 too many, especially when one of
them (metacity)
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 00:34 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 16:11 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> > Any advice for those of us using compiz (fusion-icon) with LXDE?
> > Fusion-icon crashes with compiz 0.9. Moving ~/.config/compiz aside and
> > modifying lxsession to use comp
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 16:11 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> Any advice for those of us using compiz (fusion-icon) with LXDE?
> Fusion-icon crashes with compiz 0.9. Moving ~/.config/compiz aside and
> modifying lxsession to use compiz rather than fusion icon left me
> without window decorations an
Any advice for those of us using compiz (fusion-icon) with LXDE?
Fusion-icon crashes with compiz 0.9. Moving ~/.config/compiz aside and
modifying lxsession to use compiz rather than fusion icon left me
without window decorations and a usable mouse
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
Quick note for Rawhide users: I am in the process of landing Compiz 0.9
now. Adel and I have been testing the 0.9 migration in a side repo -
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/Compiz09/compiz09/ - for a while
now, and we're happy it's working pretty well. Note that we're using the
upstream 'compiz
25 matches
Mail list logo
