Le 09/07/2011 19:20, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 19:30:56 +0200,
>Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Eric Tanguy wrote:
>>> Le 09/07/2011 14:53, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
If you aren't using fedpkg to do the local build, you might not be pass
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 19:30:56 +0200,
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Eric Tanguy wrote:
> > Le 09/07/2011 14:53, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> >>
> >> If you aren't using fedpkg to do the local build, you might not be passing
> >> the correct config options. I seem to r
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Eric Tanguy wrote:
> Le 09/07/2011 14:53, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
>>
>> If you aren't using fedpkg to do the local build, you might not be passing
>> the correct config options. I seem to remember that %config passes an
>> argument that says not to use rpath.
> It
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Eric Tanguy wrote:
> Le 09/07/2011 14:53, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
>>
>> If you aren't using fedpkg to do the local build, you might not be passing
>> the correct config options. I seem to remember that %config passes an
>> argument that says not to use rpath.
> It
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 18:50:43 +0200,
Eric Tanguy wrote:
> Le 09/07/2011 14:53, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> >
> > If you aren't using fedpkg to do the local build, you might not be passing
> > the correct config options. I seem to remember that %config passes an
> > argument that says not to u
Le 09/07/2011 14:53, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
>
> If you aren't using fedpkg to do the local build, you might not be passing
> the correct config options. I seem to remember that %config passes an
> argument that says not to use rpath.
It's correct. If i use fedpkg mockbuild there is no error wher
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 12:54:23 +0200,
Eric Tanguy wrote:
> You are right. The scratch build build fine and the package is now on bodhi.
> I can't understand why there was a problem on my local build!
> Thanks
> Eric
If you aren't using fedpkg to do the local build, you might not be passing
th
Le 09/07/2011 09:29, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 08:37:05 +0200,
>Eric Tanguy wrote:
>> Le 09/07/2011 02:47, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 22:30:01 +0200,
>>>Eric Tanguy wrote:
At the same time qucs-0.0.16 were out a new version of fre
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 08:37:05 +0200,
Eric Tanguy wrote:
> Le 09/07/2011 02:47, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> >On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 22:30:01 +0200,
> > Eric Tanguy wrote:
> >>At the same time qucs-0.0.16 were out a new version of freehdl
> >>appeared 0.0.8 but when i try to build it i have
Le 09/07/2011 02:47, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 22:30:01 +0200,
>Eric Tanguy wrote:
>> At the same time qucs-0.0.16 were out a new version of freehdl
>> appeared 0.0.8 but when i try to build it i have an error about
>> rpath and i don't know how to solve it :
>> Could
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 22:30:01 +0200,
Eric Tanguy wrote:
> At the same time qucs-0.0.16 were out a new version of freehdl
> appeared 0.0.8 but when i try to build it i have an error about
> rpath and i don't know how to solve it :
> Could you help me for this problem also ?
I did a local bui
Le 04/07/2011 05:42, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 22:30:01 +0200,
>Eric Tanguy wrote:
>> Could you help me for this problem also ?
> I can take a look at it, but probably not for a few days.
Ok thanks, the file is difficult to find because the upstream web site
is not u
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 22:30:01 +0200,
Eric Tanguy wrote:
>
> Could you help me for this problem also ?
I can take a look at it, but probably not for a few days.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Le 03/07/2011 15:33, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 08:10:25 -0500,
>Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> the normal complex definitions. But I think I have a simple hack to do
>> it now. The test build is still running, but if it works I'll post the
>> patches to the bug.
> The test
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 08:10:25 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> the normal complex definitions. But I think I have a simple hack to do
> it now. The test build is still running, but if it works I'll post the
> patches to the bug.
The test build completed. I didn't actually try running the prog
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 20:05:53 +0200,
Eric Tanguy wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I have already tried the new version with the
> same errors.
I eventually noticed that in the bug report as well. I think not using tr1
to provide complex functions is the way to go in the short run. Trying
Le 02/07/2011 17:30, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 10:21:48 -0500,
>Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:22:25 +0200,
>>Eric Tanguy wrote:
>>> I can't continue to maintain qucs because it FTBS and i'm not able to
>>> solve the problem https://bugzilla
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 10:21:48 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:22:25 +0200,
> Eric Tanguy wrote:
> > I can't continue to maintain qucs because it FTBS and i'm not able to
> > solve the problem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631404
> > i need help or
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:22:25 +0200,
Eric Tanguy wrote:
> I can't continue to maintain qucs because it FTBS and i'm not able to
> solve the problem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631404
> i need help or the package will be retired.
I'm taking a look at qucs now. I might be able
19 matches
Mail list logo
