Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 7:34 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 01:58:43PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:45 PM Fabio Valentini > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > I took over python-lockfile some time ago because it was FTBFS in > > > fed

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 01:58:43PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:45 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > I took over python-lockfile some time ago because it was FTBFS in > > fedora / orphaned at the time, but it's a dependency of some of my > > packa

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:45 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I took over python-lockfile some time ago because it was FTBFS in > fedora / orphaned at the time, but it's a dependency of some of my > packages. > > However, I have zero interest in maintaining the EPEL branches of that

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 9:51 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 20. 04. 20 13:45, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > and it seems I > > can't even figure out how to determine which EPEL packages require > > python*-lockfile. > > Take the attached repo files. > > They are good for repoquery, adapted from epel-r

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

On 20. 04. 20 13:45, Fabio Valentini wrote: and it seems I can't even figure out how to determine which EPEL packages require python*-lockfile. Take the attached repo files. They are good for repoquery, adapted from epel-release. They don't have -testing repos, but -testingx, so you don't acc

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

On 20. 04. 20 15:24, Troy Dawson wrote: On a RHEL8 machine, doing a dnf repoquery --whatrequires python3-lockfile dnf repoquery --whatrequires python2-lockfile Shows that the following depend on it duplicity python3-fedora pungi-legacy I haven't checked EPEL7 yet. $ repoquery --

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

On a RHEL8 machine, doing a dnf repoquery --whatrequires python3-lockfile dnf repoquery --whatrequires python2-lockfile Shows that the following depend on it duplicity python3-fedora pungi-legacy I haven't checked EPEL7 yet. On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 4:46 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi

Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

Hi everybody, I took over python-lockfile some time ago because it was FTBFS in fedora / orphaned at the time, but it's a dependency of some of my packages. However, I have zero interest in maintaining the EPEL branches of that package, because I have no packages in EPEL myself, and it seems I ca

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for Pantheon / elementary apps (Vala / GObject / GTK+)

Hey Alain, I've been trying to help with pantheon de on Fedora as well.Nice to know someone who has experience with vala /gtk helping , I've started to learn Vala but wil take some time to get to a stage where I can help with the apps themselves. Looking forward to working together . Thanks for h

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for Pantheon / elementary apps (Vala / GObject / GTK+)

Hello Fabio I am not very active, and not a software engineer, but Vala/GTK applications are kind of my hobby, and I had the opportunity to take a look at elementary applications (code wise too). You are maintaining much more packages I can ever pretend to maintain, so this will be a little help.

Co-Maintainers wanted for Pantheon / elementary apps (Vala / GObject / GTK+)

Hi everybody, With more responsibilities (FPC, Stewardship SIG, FESCo) and the ever-growing number of packages I maintain, I don't have as much time for the things I originally started my contributions to fedora with - the Pantheon desktop and the accompanying elementary applications. What makes

Re: Co-maintainers wanted

Ok Sent from my iPad On Aug 5, 2011, at 3:08 PM, Simon Wesp wrote: > Hi all, > > I need co-maintainers for my packages.. > Primarily for the i3 desktop family. Version 4.0.1 is out. > > My Packages: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/cassmodiah > > i3: > http://www.i3wm.o

Re: Co-maintainers wanted

This looks like a very interesting project mate. I'm very interested in becoming a co-maintainer. ;-) *Cheers, Chris Jones** * * * “Oh, so they have internet on computers now?” — Homer Simpson * * Signature powered by

Re: Co-maintainers wanted

On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 19:08:24 GMT, Simon Wesp wrote: > I need co-maintainers for my packages.. > Primarily for the i3 desktop family. Version 4.0.1 is out. > > My Packages: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/cassmodiah I use dmenu pretty heavily. Applied for comaintainership

Co-maintainers wanted

Hi all, I need co-maintainers for my packages.. Primarily for the i3 desktop family. Version 4.0.1 is out. My Packages: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/cassmodiah i3: http://www.i3wm.org -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen aus dem schönen Hainzell Simon Wesp http://fedoraproject.o