Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

2020-05-01 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 7:34 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 01:58:43PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:45 PM Fabio Valentini > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > I took over python-lockfile some time ago because it was FTBFS in > > > fed

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

2020-04-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 01:58:43PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:45 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > I took over python-lockfile some time ago because it was FTBFS in > > fedora / orphaned at the time, but it's a dependency of some of my > > packa

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

2020-04-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:45 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I took over python-lockfile some time ago because it was FTBFS in > fedora / orphaned at the time, but it's a dependency of some of my > packages. > > However, I have zero interest in maintaining the EPEL branches of that

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

2020-04-20 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 9:51 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 20. 04. 20 13:45, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > and it seems I > > can't even figure out how to determine which EPEL packages require > > python*-lockfile. > > Take the attached repo files. > > They are good for repoquery, adapted from epel-r

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

2020-04-20 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 20. 04. 20 13:45, Fabio Valentini wrote: and it seems I can't even figure out how to determine which EPEL packages require python*-lockfile. Take the attached repo files. They are good for repoquery, adapted from epel-release. They don't have -testing repos, but -testingx, so you don't acc

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

2020-04-20 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 20. 04. 20 15:24, Troy Dawson wrote: On a RHEL8 machine, doing a dnf repoquery --whatrequires python3-lockfile dnf repoquery --whatrequires python2-lockfile Shows that the following depend on it duplicity python3-fedora pungi-legacy I haven't checked EPEL7 yet. $ repoquery --

Re: Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

2020-04-20 Thread Troy Dawson
On a RHEL8 machine, doing a dnf repoquery --whatrequires python3-lockfile dnf repoquery --whatrequires python2-lockfile Shows that the following depend on it duplicity python3-fedora pungi-legacy I haven't checked EPEL7 yet. On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 4:46 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi

Co-Maintainers wanted for python-lockfile EPEL branches

2020-04-20 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi everybody, I took over python-lockfile some time ago because it was FTBFS in fedora / orphaned at the time, but it's a dependency of some of my packages. However, I have zero interest in maintaining the EPEL branches of that package, because I have no packages in EPEL myself, and it seems I ca