On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:52:34PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I only found one but I have not investigated further:
> # dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/sbin/rpcinfo
> Local Packages for Fedora 24 30 MB/s | 70 kB 00:00
> nagios-plugins-rpc-0:2.1.1-1.fc24.x86_64
In that
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> On 11/28/2016 03:41 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Are there any rules regarding changing the
> > path of binaries?
> >
> > rpcbind/rpcinfo has lived in /usr/sbin for
> > years but that is because the spec file moves
> > the
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:57:08PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> It depends on whether you consider that file location to be "API" or
> not. Given that upstream considers them to belong in /usr/bin, I'd
> guess that probably there aren't any other packages relying on these
> executables living
On 11/28/2016 03:41 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Are there any rules regarding changing the
> path of binaries?
>
> rpcbind/rpcinfo has lived in /usr/sbin for
> years but that is because the spec file moves
> the binary from /usr/bin to /usr/sbin during
> the install. Upstream default
Hello,
Are there any rules regarding changing the
path of binaries?
rpcbind/rpcinfo has lived in /usr/sbin for
years but that is because the spec file moves
the binary from /usr/bin to /usr/sbin during
the install. Upstream defaults to /usr/bin.
Due to some systemd service file changes
I wou
