On 12/22/2011 08:50 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
At $WORKPLACE I use a Java app (via javaws) - EMC NetWorker Management
Console - that won't work with OpenJDK (it pops up a username/password
window as expected but doesn't then pop up the main app window once the
username+password have been entered), w
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 06:09:57PM +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 20.12.2011 19:30, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> >Probably because OpenJDK and SunJDK aren't really that compatible.
>
> I am afraid that most of these problems are caused by stupid
> developers who are using (against all advices the
On 12/22/2011 10:41 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> At $WORKPLACE I use a Java app (via javaws) - EMC NetWorker Management
> Console - that won't work with OpenJDK (it pops up a username/password
> window as expected but doesn't then pop up the main app window once the
> username+password have been enter
* Paul Howarth [2011-12-22 05:41]:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:17:15 +
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> > On 12/21/2011 10:45 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > > On 21.12.2011 18:52, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > >> There really is very little difference between the com.sun.*
> > >> classes in OpenJDK and the propr
On 14:12 Thu 22 Dec , Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 06:52 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > On 12/21/2011 05:09 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> >> On 20.12.2011 19:30, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> >>> Probably because OpenJDK and SunJDK aren't really that compatible.
> >
> > Well, hold on.
On 12/21/2011 06:52 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/21/2011 05:09 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 20.12.2011 19:30, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Probably because OpenJDK and SunJDK aren't really that compatible.
Well, hold on. Both the proprietary JDK and OpenJDK meet the
specification, and we try ve
On 10:41 Thu 22 Dec , Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:17:15 +
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> > On 12/21/2011 10:45 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > > On 21.12.2011 18:52, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > >> There really is very little difference between the com.sun.*
> > >> classes in OpenJDK and
On 22/12/11 11:05, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Source is often not available.
You *do* have the *.class files,
But I wont explain further.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:52:13AM +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 22/12/11 10:41, Paul Howarth wrote:
> >
> >At $WORKPLACE I use a Java app (via javaws) - EMC NetWorker Management
> >Console - that won't work with OpenJDK (it pops up a username/password
> >window as expected but doesn't then pop u
On 22/12/11 10:41, Paul Howarth wrote:
At $WORKPLACE I use a Java app (via javaws) - EMC NetWorker Management
Console - that won't work with OpenJDK (it pops up a username/password
window as expected but doesn't then pop up the main app window once the
username+password have been entered), whils
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:17:15 +
Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 10:45 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > On 21.12.2011 18:52, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >> There really is very little difference between the com.sun.*
> >> classes in OpenJDK and the proprietary JDK, as far as I know. Of
> >> course, I h
On 12/21/2011 10:45 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 21.12.2011 18:52, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> There really is very little difference between the com.sun.* classes
>> in OpenJDK and the proprietary JDK, as far as I know. Of course, I
>> haven't really checked, but... ;-)
>
> So, what is the root cause
On 21.12.2011 18:52, Andrew Haley wrote:
There really is very little difference between the com.sun.* classes
in OpenJDK and the proprietary JDK, as far as I know. Of course, I
haven't really checked, but... ;-)
So, what is the root cause of (infrequent, but persistent) alarms about
incompat
Le Mer 21 décembre 2011 19:22, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
> On 12/21/2011 10:45 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> On 18:09 Wed 21 Dec , Matej Cepl wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Also, on the theme of stupid programmers, see
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741821 (although I am not
>>> sure w
On 12/21/2011 05:09 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 20.12.2011 19:30, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> Probably because OpenJDK and SunJDK aren't really that compatible.
Well, hold on. Both the proprietary JDK and OpenJDK meet the
specification, and we try very hard to be compatible with all
the things
On 12/21/2011 10:45 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 18:09 Wed 21 Dec , Matej Cepl wrote:
>>
>> Also, on the theme of stupid programmers, see
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741821 (although I am not
>> sure where the stupidity lies in this issue).
>
> With whoever decid
On 18:09 Wed 21 Dec , Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 20.12.2011 19:30, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> > Probably because OpenJDK and SunJDK aren't really that compatible.
>
> I am afraid that most of these problems are caused by stupid developers
> who are using (against all advices they were given)
On 20.12.2011 19:30, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Probably because OpenJDK and SunJDK aren't really that compatible.
I am afraid that most of these problems are caused by stupid developers
who are using (against all advices they were given) com.sun.* classes
(which I am said is the most commo
On 12/20/2011 05:48 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Peter Robinson wrote:
Actually that's not entirely correct. They're removing the Sun Java
closed source variant due to changes in licensing from Oracle
preventing them from shipping security fixes. They also ship OpenJDK
which is the open source releas
Peter Robinson wrote:
> Actually that's not entirely correct. They're removing the Sun Java
> closed source variant due to changes in licensing from Oracle
> preventing them from shipping security fixes. They also ship OpenJDK
> which is the open source release of the Java JDK as shipped in Fedora
On 06:54 Sun 18 Dec , Neal Becker wrote:
> http://lxer.com/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=159737
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Saw this on LWN. It's because of Oracle licensing changes and
may actually
drago01 wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> http://lxer.com/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=159737
>
> So? They are removing the non free Sun JDK ... which we never shipped.
Sorry, I was confused - shouldn't post so early in the morning.
--
devel mailing list
dev
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> http://lxer.com/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=159737
Actually that's not entirely correct. They're removing the Sun Java
closed source variant due to changes in licensing from Oracle
preventing them from shipping security fixes. They also
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> http://lxer.com/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=159737
So? They are removing the non free Sun JDK ... which we never shipped.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
http://lxer.com/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=159737
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
25 matches
Mail list logo
