Re: Call for Participation - Fedora 13 Talking Points

2010-02-28 Thread Jens Petersen
- "Paul W. Frields" wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:06:09PM -0500, Jens Petersen wrote: > > Perhaps I missed it but I didn't see any clear indication that > > a Talking Point has to be a Feature. Is that the case? > > It doesn't. A Talking Point should be clearly advantageous to the > l

Re: Call for Participation - Fedora 13 Talking Points

2010-02-23 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:06:09PM -0500, Jens Petersen wrote: > Perhaps I missed it but I didn't see any clear indication that > a Talking Point has to be a Feature. Is that the case? It doesn't. A Talking Point should be clearly advantageous to the latest release or somehow contemporaneous wit

Re: Call for Participation - Fedora 13 Talking Points

2010-02-22 Thread Jens Petersen
Perhaps I missed it but I didn't see any clear indication that a Talking Point has to be a Feature. Is that the case? Jens -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Call for Participation - Fedora 13 Talking Points

2010-02-19 Thread Robyn Bergeron
Talking points are key highlights of the new release. They should be compelling, but they will not necessarily be comprehensive. There are different types of talking points for different types of people: general desktop users/everyone, developers, and sysadmins.  For the Fedora 13 cycle, we will al