Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> If we move back to having a rawhide/devel/master repo the problem
> becomes "which rawhide" ? if you build something in that branch a year
> ago, what are the chances it will still work?
I have packages built in 2007 that still work (in the CalcForge repository).
Kevi
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:00:15 +0100
> Michal Novotny wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Vít Ondruch
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I honestly don't understand what is purpose of the f26 vs master.
> > > Why we have empty master currently (s
Many changes into Fedora area is instability with development and for
attracting
new developers.
I advocate the development of overlapping time periods only reason : the
developers implement the software into many distributions.
That allow to make changes in time.
... a real problem is spam and inc
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:00:15 +0100
Michal Novotny wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Vít Ondruch
> wrote:
>
> > I honestly don't understand what is purpose of the f26 vs master.
> > Why we have empty master currently (speaking of dist-git)? master
> > should be the same as rawhide, as i
On Tuesday, February 21, 2017 11:00:15 AM CET Michal Novotny wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> > I honestly don't understand what is purpose of the f26 vs master. Why we
> > have empty master currently (speaking of dist-git)? master should be the
> > same as rawhid
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I honestly don't understand what is purpose of the f26 vs master. Why we
> have empty master currently (speaking of dist-git)? master should be the
> same as rawhide, as it is in Fedora.
>
Yes, I think that makes more sense as well.
P.S. Ad
