Re: Building the boot.iso with dnf5

2023-12-14 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 07:04:03PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 09. 12. 23 v 12:57 Peter Robinson napsal(a): > > It was my understanding the switch to dnf5 was delayed until F-41 so I > > don't think we should be using it for this either until it's the > > default in Fedora as well. > > It w

Re: Building the boot.iso with dnf5

2023-12-09 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 09. 12. 23 v 12:57 Peter Robinson napsal(a): It was my understanding the switch to dnf5 was delayed until F-41 so I don't think we should be using it for this either until it's the default in Fedora as well. It was delayed because it was not ready for general usage. E.g. some functionality

Re: Building the boot.iso with dnf5

2023-12-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 7:35 PM Brian C. Lane wrote: > > With the approval of > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildWithDNF5 it seems like a > good time to move Lorax over to using dnf5 to create the boot.iso. My > current plan is to merge my dnf5 branch do a new build on Monday > (12/11).

Building the boot.iso with dnf5

2023-12-08 Thread Brian C. Lane
With the approval of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildWithDNF5 it seems like a good time to move Lorax over to using dnf5 to create the boot.iso. My current plan is to merge my dnf5 branch do a new build on Monday (12/11). You can preview this here: https://github.com/weldr/lorax/pull/13