Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 8:45 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> >
> > A lot of perl packages (at least) use the macro %{_fixpermss}. Defined
> > in /usr/lib/rpm/macros (from rpm itself), the macro uses chmod. When
> > reviewing a new package of mine, the reviewer said I sho
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 19:44:26 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> reviewing a new package of mine, the reviewer said I should BR
> coreutils because of that, which makes sense...
Package "coreutils" is part of the build-system core set of packages
for many, many years and thus doesn't need to become a BR.
On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 8:45 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> A lot of perl packages (at least) use the macro %{_fixpermss}. Defined
> in /usr/lib/rpm/macros (from rpm itself), the macro uses chmod. When
> reviewing a new package of mine, the reviewer said I should BR
> coreutils because of that, which
A lot of perl packages (at least) use the macro %{_fixpermss}. Defined
in /usr/lib/rpm/macros (from rpm itself), the macro uses chmod. When
reviewing a new package of mine, the reviewer said I should BR
coreutils because of that, which makes sense... although thinking about
it, should a package r
