Re: BuildRequires: coreutils and %{_fixperms}

2025-04-06 Thread Björn Persson
Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 8:45 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > > > A lot of perl packages (at least) use the macro %{_fixpermss}. Defined > > in /usr/lib/rpm/macros (from rpm itself), the macro uses chmod. When > > reviewing a new package of mine, the reviewer said I sho

Re: BuildRequires: coreutils and %{_fixperms}

2025-04-06 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 19:44:26 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > reviewing a new package of mine, the reviewer said I should BR > coreutils because of that, which makes sense... Package "coreutils" is part of the build-system core set of packages for many, many years and thus doesn't need to become a BR.

Re: BuildRequires: coreutils and %{_fixperms}

2025-04-05 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 8:45 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > A lot of perl packages (at least) use the macro %{_fixpermss}. Defined > in /usr/lib/rpm/macros (from rpm itself), the macro uses chmod. When > reviewing a new package of mine, the reviewer said I should BR > coreutils because of that, which

BuildRequires: coreutils and %{_fixperms}

2025-04-05 Thread Chris Adams
A lot of perl packages (at least) use the macro %{_fixpermss}. Defined in /usr/lib/rpm/macros (from rpm itself), the macro uses chmod. When reviewing a new package of mine, the reviewer said I should BR coreutils because of that, which makes sense... although thinking about it, should a package r