On Mon, Sep 2 2024 at 07:56:58 AM +02:00:00, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
Michael, if you still feel this should be reported upstream, there is
this bug in Debian Sid - our systems haven't filed an FTBFS bug yet:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078386
I'd say the return ty
Thank you both for the input. I guess I should patch
gnome-chemistry-utils regardless of what happens in glib.
Michael, if you still feel this should be reported upstream, there is
this bug in Debian Sid - our systems haven't filed an FTBFS bug yet:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
On 01/09/2024 23:26, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
I can sort of understand the rationale behind that, but I'd like
someone who is more actively involved with C++ to give some advice if
this is something I should be reporting to the glib folks, or if I
should just change the writable string pointe
We should probably revert that. If you have a GNOME GitLab account,
feel free to create an issue report. Otherwise, I can do so.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproje
Hello,
I was looking at the build logs of gnome-chemistry-utils in koschei
and it seems that a recent change in glib is the reason for the
package FTBFS:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/commit/c583162cc6d7078ff549c72615617092b0bc150a
I can sort of understand the rationale behind that, but
