Re: Build-essential packages

2015-06-17 Thread Mat Booth
On 12 June 2015 at 21:32, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Friday, June 12, 2015 02:21:14 PM Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > On 06/12/2015 12:11 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > On Thursday, June 11, 2015 08:36:38 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > >> On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > >>> The

Re: Build-essential packages

2015-06-16 Thread Michael Šimáček
On 2015-06-12 22:32, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Friday, June 12, 2015 02:21:14 PM Carlos O'Donell wrote: On 06/12/2015 12:11 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Thursday, June 11, 2015 08:36:38 AM Florian Weimer wrote: On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: The BuildRequires section of

Re: Build-essential packages

2015-06-14 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Friday, June 12, 2015 02:21:14 PM Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 06/12/2015 12:11 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > On Thursday, June 11, 2015 08:36:38 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > >> On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>> The BuildRequires section of the guidelines has been revised; t

Re: Build-essential packages

2015-06-12 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On 06/12/2015 12:11 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Thursday, June 11, 2015 08:36:38 AM Florian Weimer wrote: >> On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>> The BuildRequires section of the guidelines has been revised; the >>> exceptions list is gone. The release engineering folks are f

Re: Build-essential packages (was: Re: [Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines)

2015-06-12 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 08:36:38 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > The BuildRequires section of the guidelines has been revised; the > > exceptions list is gone. The release engineering folks are free to > > define the buildroot and rpm is free t

Re: Build-essential packages

2015-06-11 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2015-06-11, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > Otherwise build-essentials will get cargo-culted into every spec file > and we're back to a defined buildroot standard based on build-essentials > which will grow over the years. All the things RCM wanted to avoid. > I fully agree with this paragraph. -- Pe

Re: Build-essential packages

2015-06-11 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On 06/11/2015 02:36 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >> The BuildRequires section of the guidelines has been revised; the >> exceptions list is gone. The release engineering folks are free to >> define the buildroot and rpm is free to change its de

Build-essential packages (was: Re: [Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines)

2015-06-10 Thread Florian Weimer
On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > The BuildRequires section of the guidelines has been revised; the > exceptions list is gone. The release engineering folks are free to > define the buildroot and rpm is free to change its dependency list. > * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Pa