On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 11:12 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:39:34PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> > I was curious about the rate of bug reporting in Fedora, and did
> > this quick experiment. I thought it might be interesting to folks
> > here who either work on th
On 10/11/2014 09:44 PM, John Reiser wrote:
bug velocity (increase in the bug number divided by the time
>> interval) over time
> That quotient is a scalar. Please use "bug rate" instead of "bug
> velocity".Easy mnemonic: Velocity is a Vector, Speed is a Scalar.
> "Velocity" has multiple syllab
> bug velocity (increase in the bug number divided by the time interval) over
> time
That quotient is a scalar. Please use "bug rate" instead of "bug velocity".
Easy mnemonic: Velocity is a Vector, Speed is a Scalar.
"Velocity" has multiple syllables and multiple coordinates,
"speed" has one s
On 10/10/2014 06:12 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:39:34PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
I was curious about the rate of bug reporting in Fedora, and did
this quick experiment. I thought it might be interesting to folks
here who either work on the infrastructure or ar
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:39:34PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> I was curious about the rate of bug reporting in Fedora, and did
> this quick experiment. I thought it might be interesting to folks
> here who either work on the infrastructure or are curious about
> long-term collaboration trend
per day and rising (a bug every 3 minutes or so).
This is pretty fun, but doesn't it speak about bugzilla usage in general (ie:
Fedora, EPEL, RHEL, Atomic...)?
Or did you make sure you're only getting Fedora's bugs?
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:/
I was curious about the rate of bug reporting in Fedora, and did this
quick experiment. I thought it might be interesting to folks here who
either work on the infrastructure or are curious about long-term
collaboration trends in Fedora.
I checked the date of reporting of every 10,000th bug (bu
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> This is why I actually really enjoyed the brief period that bugzilla
> automatically searched closed bugs, though I can see why that isn't
> sustainable. Perhaps it could automatically search closed bugs for
> supported releases?
Or perha
On 3/31/2010 2:53 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> No one has so far defined a workflow that requires an accurate audit
> of active deficiencies in any release. Closing bugs fixed rawhide
> certainly cause some annoyances because closed bugs are marginally
> harder to search for (because you have to requ
