Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> I'm helping to sort out the tagging mess, and submit things in smaller
>> batches.
>
> In 6 batches of ~50 packages each, I have it all submitted for -testing in
> bodhi.
>
> I'll followup with update id's once they get pushed.
https://admin.fedorap
On 13/08/15 10:49 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
I'm helping to sort out the tagging mess, and submit things in smaller
batches.
In 6 batches of ~50 packages each, I have it all submitted for -testing in
bodhi.
I'll followup with update id's once they get pushed.
Thanks, Rex, I
Rex Dieter wrote:
> I'm helping to sort out the tagging mess, and submit things in smaller
> batches.
In 6 batches of ~50 packages each, I have it all submitted for -testing in
bodhi.
I'll followup with update id's once they get pushed.
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 11/08/15 15:43 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>On 10/08/15 12:24 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>>On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:51:30 +0100
>>>José Matos wrote:
>>>
On Saturday 18 July 2015 12:46:51 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've pushed a new version of Boo
On 11/08/15 15:43 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 10/08/15 12:24 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:51:30 +0100
José Matos wrote:
On Saturday 18 July 2015 12:46:51 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Hi,
I've pushed a new version of Boost, 1.58.0, to rawhide and f23,
which will require al
On 10/08/15 12:24 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:51:30 +0100
José Matos wrote:
On Saturday 18 July 2015 12:46:51 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've pushed a new version of Boost, 1.58.0, to rawhide and f23,
> which will require all packages that depend on Boost to be rebui
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:51:30 +0100
José Matos wrote:
> On Saturday 18 July 2015 12:46:51 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've pushed a new version of Boost, 1.58.0, to rawhide and f23,
> > which will require all packages that depend on Boost to be rebuilt.
> > The plan was to update to 1.
On Saturday 18 July 2015 12:46:51 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've pushed a new version of Boost, 1.58.0, to rawhide and f23, which
> will require all packages that depend on Boost to be rebuilt. The plan
> was to update to 1.59.0 but that isn't going to be released in time
> for the F23 sche
On Thursday, 23 July 2015 at 19:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 23/07/15 14:27 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >>Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or
> >>ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is
On 31/07/15 14:49 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Ceph failed to build with some impenetrable C++ error:
In file included from /usr/include/boost/optional/optional.hpp:28:0,
from /usr/include/boost/optional/optional_io.hpp:19,
from ./include/encoding.h:289,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/29/2015 12:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Mukundan,
> can you please decide whether you want to:
>
> i) patch out the #error and keep building against wxGTK 3 against
> upstream's advice ii) revert to building against wxGTK 2
>
> and then mak
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 02:49:26PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Any ideas on that one? This blocks qemu and all the rest of the virt
> stack.
Don't worry - I found the upstream bug with a fix:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4616
I'll try that.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization
Ceph failed to build with some impenetrable C++ error:
In file included from /usr/include/boost/optional/optional.hpp:28:0,
from /usr/include/boost/optional/optional_io.hpp:19,
from ./include/encoding.h:289,
from ./include/uuid.h:8,
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 19:26 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > scantailor
>
> This has some weird CMake error about being unable to figure out how
> to use -pthread.
This one boiled down to crappy upstream build scripts which disregard
the provided CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS values:
https://github.co
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 19:26 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >> fityk
>
> Not Boost related:
>
> app.cpp:12:2: error: #error "Not everything is working with wxGTK3.
> Use default wxGTK instead, " "based on GTK+2. If you want to test it,
> just remove this #error."
So this one does exactly what
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 19:26 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >> condor
>
> Another BuildRequires failure with libpoppler.so
In fact you managed to get an attempt through which failed in
compilation:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8134/10448134/build.log
I've been figuring that on
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 14:49 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 28/07/15 14:48 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On 27/07/15 19:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:31 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > > On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > >
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 17:35 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > > Any problems rebuil
On 28/07/15 14:48 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 27/07/15 19:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:31 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 20
On 27/07/15 19:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:31 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:33 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > > Any problems rebuil
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 13:31 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > > Any problems rebuil
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 09:48 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 24/07/15 19:26 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > > flamerobin
> >
> > This looks like a Boost problem:
> >
> > configure: error: invalid value: boost_major_version=
> >
> > But actually it's caused by a GCC change that puts a # pre
On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or
> ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is 'red
On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or
> ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is 'red
On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or
> ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is 'red
On 24/07/15 19:26 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
flamerobin
This looks like a Boost problem:
configure: error: invalid value: boost_major_version=
But actually it's caused by a GCC change that puts a # preprocessor
marker before macro expansions:
boost-lib-version = # 2 "/tmp/conftest.cpp" 3
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 19:26 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > > Any problems rebuil
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 19:26:09 +0100,
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
blobby needs this patch to build:
http://git.engineering.redhat.com/git/users/jwakely/fedora/blobby/commit/?h=ostream
Could you attach a copy of that patch to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239387 (the blobby FTBF
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 19:26:09 +0100,
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
blobby
blobby needs this patch to build:
http://git.engineering.redhat.com/git/users/jwakely/fedora/blobby/commit/?h=ostream
(I've sent the patch to one of the upstream project maintainers).
But it still fails anyway with:
/
On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or
> ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is 'red
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:27 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> This is a work-in-progress list of FTBFS packages:
>
> * Build failures:
>
> - F23 + Rawhide
...
> polymake
The polymake build was already broken for other reasons (namely, the
latest perl update broke it, which happens with pretty much every
On 07/24/2015 02:31 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 23/07/15 14:39 -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
>> On 07/23/2015 02:33 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
>>> Is this a general failure in f23-boost, or just a few packages?
>>
>> The f23-boost target tag is using build tag f23-build!
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/
On Thursday, July 23, 2015 02:39:53 PM Josh Stone wrote:
> On 07/23/2015 02:33 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> > Is this a general failure in f23-boost, or just a few packages?
>
> The f23-boost target tag is using build tag f23-build!
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildtargetinfo?targetID=150
I ha
On 23/07/15 22:33, Josh Stone wrote:
On 07/22/2015 07:50 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22/07/15 15:30 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 22/07/15 14:54, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
mapnik-0:2.2.1-0.4.20150127git0639d54.fc23.src
nodejs-mapnik-vector-tile-0:0.6.2-6.fc23.src
I did these for both branches
On 23/07/15 19:06 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
The attached patch fixes the xs build for rawhide.
Upstream fixed it differently:
https://github.com/frytvm/XS/commit/034bab9965ab554c4e51053d65cf18a9f40192db
I'll add that patch to the spec file instead.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedora
On 24/07/15 11:00 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email
On 23/07/15 14:33 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or
> ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is 'red
On 23/07/15 14:39 -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
On 07/23/2015 02:33 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
Is this a general failure in f23-boost, or just a few packages?
The f23-boost target tag is using build tag f23-build!
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildtargetinfo?targetID=150
vs f24-boost has itself f
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 14:39 -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 07/23/2015 02:33 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> > Is this a general failure in f23-boost, or just a few packages?
>
> The f23-boost target tag is using build tag f23-build!
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildtargetinfo?targetID=150
>
> vs
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 13:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It seems odd to land the new build into the F23 and Rawhide repos and
> *then* set up a side tag to do rebuilds. What's the point of that?
Well, I must have misunderstood here, because looking at the actual
builds, it seems that indeed bo
On 07/23/2015 02:33 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> Is this a general failure in f23-boost, or just a few packages?
The f23-boost target tag is using build tag f23-build!
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildtargetinfo?targetID=150
vs f24-boost has itself for both build and destination tag:
http://koj
On 07/22/2015 07:50 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 22/07/15 15:30 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
>> On 22/07/15 14:54, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>>> mapnik-0:2.2.1-0.4.20150127git0639d54.fc23.src
>>> nodejs-mapnik-vector-tile-0:0.6.2-6.fc23.src
>>
>> I did these for both branches when you announced it a
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 13:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 19:55 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On 23/07/15 14:27 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > > Any problems rebuilding either open
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:27 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> blender: esound-devel (retired)
The blender (root) issue is 2.75 is not building with either the
openCOLLADA in Fedora or locally with the latest checkout.
I've filed an issue with openCOLLADA github, but no response as of yet.
As far as
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 19:55 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 23/07/15 14:27 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email
> > > me or
> > > ping me on IRC (my free
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 16:18 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
>
> Also, the timing is really unfortunate. The update should have
> happened
> before F-23 branch-off, not a week after it :-) Now every package has
> to
> be rebuilt twice.
It's also unfortunate from another angle. We're trying to build F
On 23/07/15 14:27 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or
ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is 'redi') and I'll be happy to help.
This is a work-in-progress list of FTB
On 23/07/15 18:50 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/07/15 14:27 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or
ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is 'redi') and I'll be happy
On 23/07/15 14:27 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or
ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is 'redi') and I'll be happy to help.
This is a work-in-progress list of FTB
On 23/07/15 14:27 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or
ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is 'redi') and I'll be happy to help.
This is a work-in-progress list of FTB
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:27 PM, David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or
>> ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is 'redi') and I'll be happy to help.
>
> This is a work-in-p
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:27 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> * Build failures:
>
> - F23 + Rawhide
> condor
I'll try to take a peek at this one in the next day or two if no one
beats me to it.
--
Ben Cotton
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 02:27:33PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or
> > ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is 'redi') and I'll be happy to help.
>
> Th
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or
> ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is 'redi') and I'll be happy to help.
This is a work-in-progress list of FTBFS packages:
* Build failures:
- F23 + Rawh
On 22/07/15 15:30 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 22/07/15 14:54, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
mapnik-0:2.2.1-0.4.20150127git0639d54.fc23.src
nodejs-mapnik-vector-tile-0:0.6.2-6.fc23.src
I did these for both branches when you announced it at the weekend.
Great, thanks.
nodejs-mapnik-0:1.4.17-7.fc23
On 22/07/15 14:54, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
mapnik-0:2.2.1-0.4.20150127git0639d54.fc23.src
nodejs-mapnik-vector-tile-0:0.6.2-6.fc23.src
I did these for both branches when you announced it at the weekend.
nodejs-mapnik-0:1.4.17-7.fc23.src
This one is proving more interesting...
It builds fin
On 22/07/15 16:18 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
I've learnt from IRC that I would need to be a provenpackager to do it
myself, which I'm not, so either package owners need to rebuild, or if
that doesn't happen in time I'll have to rely on the kindness of a
provenpackager to help out.
I can help. B
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 01:47:49PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 22/07/15 13:30 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >On 22/07/15 14:08 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I've pushed a new version of
On 22/07/15 13:47 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22/07/15 13:30 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22/07/15 14:08 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Hi,
I've pushed a new version of Boost, 1.58.0, to rawhide and f23, which
will req
On 22/07/15 13:30 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22/07/15 14:08 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Hi,
I've pushed a new version of Boost, 1.58.0, to rawhide and f23, which
will require all packages that depend on Boost to be rebu
On 22/07/15 14:08 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Hi,
I've pushed a new version of Boost, 1.58.0, to rawhide and f23, which
will require all packages that depend on Boost to be rebuilt. The plan
was to update to 1.59.0 but that is
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've pushed a new version of Boost, 1.58.0, to rawhide and f23, which
> will require all packages that depend on Boost to be rebuilt. The plan
> was to update to 1.59.0 but that isn't going to be released in time
> for
Hi,
I've pushed a new version of Boost, 1.58.0, to rawhide and f23, which
will require all packages that depend on Boost to be rebuilt. The plan
was to update to 1.59.0 but that isn't going to be released in time
for the F23 schedule, so I'll update rawhide to 1.59.0 at a later
date.
For the F23
64 matches
Mail list logo
